Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin contributing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Proposed deletion of Bruno Lescoeur

edit
 

The article Bruno Lescoeur has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. George Ponderevo (talk) 15:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bruno Lescoeur

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bruno Lescoeur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Potential conflict of interests

edit

Dear Floydrosebridge. It seems that you may have a conflict of interest regrading Edison S.p.A.. Therefore, please take a look of the WP:COI and WP:RS policies. Please be aware that Wikipedia is not a tool to promote the company and reliable third party references are needed. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 18:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

As an editor having potential conflict of interest, please read and follow the WP:AVOIDCOI. If you think that information should be changed, please follow the guidelines provided at the above-mentioned page. Please be aware that the company website is not sufficient for references about the company; third-party reliable sources are needed (please see WP:RS). Thank you. Beagel (talk) 12:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The problem is that most of these information are only on Edison's website, that is the only source.How can I add better references than the company itself. I'm not editing this article with advertising purpose, I'm just adding neutral informations, that are not provided by other sources than edison's website.