FlaviusFunderburke

Welcome FlaviusFunderburke!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,463,833 registered editors!

Hello FlaviusFunderburke. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, User:Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

IP edits

There is no need to self report that you made edits as an IP user before creating your account. Unless your IP was blocked (which, from what I see, it was not), creating an account after editing as an IP does not count as sockpuppetry, and is how most editors start out. - ZLEA _T\^C 16:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the clarification.FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 16:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

FlaviusFunderburke, welcome. Glad to see that you've registered an account! Jweiss11 (talk) 18:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Formatting coaching tree sections:

A few points of style on the coaching tree sections you are adding/expanding:

• Year ranges should be punctuated with an endash (–), not a hyphen (-). See WP:DASH for more on that.
• For current tenures, "present" should not be capitalized.
• When noting college football programs in lists and tables, the standard is just to display the short name, not the fight name, so simply "Oregon", not "Oregon Ducks" or "Oregon Webfoots". And be sure to link to Oregon Ducks football, not Oregon Ducks.

Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I'll work on that. Sorry you have to clean up after me.FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bud Wilkinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Larry Wilson

Nebraska Cornhuskers football (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cornhusker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Coaching tree suggestions

If you remain interested in coaching trees, consider: (a) Amos Alonzo Stagg, Walter Camp, George Halas, Bear Bryant, Frank Leahy, or Hayden Fry, who don't have trees currently, or (b) Pop Warner, Bobby Bowden, Joe Paterno, Tom Osborne, Lou Holtz, Jess Neely, Bud Wilkinson, and Frank Beamer whose trees seem to be in need of attention. Cbl62 (talk) 20:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

FWIW: Few of us like to be told what to do, and the suggestion above was meant purely in the spirit of good faith and not in any way to dictate how you should be spending your time. Cbl62 (talk) 20:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. I only saw both messages so no offense taken. Stagg would need its own page. He's 1st Gen under Camp for chrissakes. FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 20:38, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

If anyone deserves a coaching tree, it's Stagg. Branches from Stagg include Fritz Crisler, Jesse Harper, Hugo Bezdek, Clarence Herschberger, Nelson Norgren, Harlan Page, Frederick A. Speik, Walter S. Kennedy, Walter Steffen, John Webster Thomas, Ralph H. Young, Tony Hinkle, Shorty Ellsworth, Wayne Hardin, Mysterious Walker, Ivan Doseff, Paul Stagg, and Amos Alonzo Stagg Jr., to name a few. Cbl62 (talk) 22:06, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Also, 1985 Iowa Hawkeyes football team#Future head coaches gives a head start on a Hayden Fry tree. Fry's mid-1980s coaching staff (Bob Stoops, Bill Snyder, Barry Alvarez, Kirk Ferentz, etc.) may be one of the most impressive of all time. Cbl62 (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Yes that is. Sources galore for that too. Up there with Jim Mackenzie at Oklahoma (a random one I worked on that turned out to be loaded holy smokes). TBH though, I'm first waiting to resolve the outstanding issue on the talk page. Waiting to hear from JWeiss primarily. That will go a long way to determine if I even want to continue being involved in this community--if its open to new ideas and participants or if I am the outsider in a fiefdom of small-town southern sheriffs. I take you at your word, but if he's going to immediately just start undoing what I've already done, whos to say a new consensus later on will similarly revert my work. This isn't diction in an article, this is substantive contributions. If they aren't welcome, and much more importantly, if JWeiss and others don't show any willingness or spirit to compromise, and instead demand a my way or the highway approach under the guise of consensus, then this is absolutely not something I want to keep doing. FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 22:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is nobody's fiefdom. It operates by consensus which sometimes goes against one's personal interests. I had that happen to me a number of times in my early years here (2007, 2008), and it takes time to get accustomed to it. That said, I've spent a ton (probably multiple tons) of time over the last decade trying to enhance coverage of areas of interest (principally baseball, American football, and historic architecture) and have found it to be immensely rewarding. There's so much left to accomplish here, I hope you'll consider sticking around whichever way the "coaching tree" debate concludes. Cbl62 (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

I did my best to find a compromise. Sadly my spirit of compromise was not engaged and met halfway. This isn’t worth it. Good luck accomplishing all you have to. I hope re,icing coaching trees doesn’t set you back. FlaviusFunderburke (talk) 01:53, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)