Actually, that sounds fine if you want to delete it. I just merged some of the info into the actual quesadilla page. Thanks for your concern.

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Quesadilla, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply edit

Thank you for your concern, however, it is ill founded. The Quesadilla page does not have any references. Why then should I be concerned about my references if the entire article does not cite any? After all this is just a dang Quesadilla. I will cite one reference, that being the video clip of Napoleon Dynamite, other than that, for the information displayed, I do not deem it necessary to cite any additional references.

Please see WP:BURDEN. You might want to read some of the guidelines before making more edits. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Disagreement of Article edit

Delicious carbuncle: I have come to defend the case of Flashpro. I have found all of his references to be correct, and therefore, you cannot, without good reason, remove his reference to Dang Quesadilla in the Wikipedia page Quesadilla.

We appreciate your concern for the concern of referencing for information that Flashpro has recently added to the Quesadilla page. But you have not answered any of his questions; why are there not any references cited in the quesadilla page? I am re-posting the information that you have taken off of the Quesadilla page, along with the reference to the video, which is proof enough to cover all of your concerns.

With the information and references that I will ad to the Quesadilla page, there is no way that you can take it off, as it does and will comply with Wikipedia's terms for editing Wikipedia pages. Thank you for understanding that Wikipedia is here for everyone to edit, given that the information has substantial proof to back it up. Tchurch1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchurch1 (talkcontribs) 20:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC) Reply

See my previous comment. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Response edit

We kindly thank you for your concerns, but we would appreciate it if you did not keep removing our content from the Quesadilla page. Also, when you reply, speak in full sentences. Tchurch1