May 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Peter 15:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Stop edit

Editing only to promote Wenger. If you continue you will be blocked from editing. Peter 15:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 16:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flagada99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, i'm the IT Manager of Wenger and i only searched all pages speaking of knives and wanted to add our homepage cause we are a knife maker. Sorry if i did something wrong. Regards

Decline reason:

That's an apology, not a request for unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flagada99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can you please unblock my account ? i've only added those links on knife's related articles cause our company is a knife maker. Regards

Decline reason:

Your request seems to indicate that either you have not read, or are not willing to follow, the conflict of interest guidelines or the spam guidelines. An unblock is unfortunately impossible in this situation. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:49, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flagada99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Forget it. All i wanted to do was to complete article speaking about knives with some informations and not only links ... so please delete my changes if you want to do it and thanks to unblock my account. Regards

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    • understand what you have been blocked for,
    • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Flagada99 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can't understand which damage i could do on Wikipedia by inserting a link to a knife maker in articles speaking of knives, i think it's good for people who have some interests to can have more informations. But ok now you can unblock my account cause i understood why i've been blocked and as i already did (but without account) i will continue to make useful contributions. Thanks

Decline reason:

Explicit lack of understanding rules. Toddst1 (talk) 14:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you read WP:COI and WP:SPAM? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I've disabled your recent use of the unblock template, because you aren't requesting unblock- please, only use that template to request unblock. A successful unblock request will generally show that you understand the rule you were blocked for breaking, and that you have a plan for following the rules in the future. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)Reply