Fitbryceadams

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bryce Adams (FitBryceAdams) (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bryce Adams (FitBryceAdams) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fitbryceadams (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

fitbryceadams2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i was wrongfully blocked by creating a article with only facts and articles written by the waashington post and business insider for example. i will consult with the reviewers to get more clarification before i publish an article, there is no way my article was Unambiguous advertising ANYTHING. for anyone reading this message, if you look at Lisa Anns page for reference, she has IMDB linked, her personal website and social medias linked. i wrote factual statements backedup by supporting articles on the creators career while adding the creators social medias as well

Decline reason:

Adding '2' to your inappropriate username obviously won't convert it to an appropriate username, please reread WP:USERNAME. You have not addressed your violation of WP:COI. Don't try to deny this. You personally took the photos, File:Bryceadams20244.jpg and File:Bryce adams in real life iphone.jpg and you personally own the copyright to these images. As you see no problems with Draft:Bryce Adams despite the obvious inappropriateness of the draft, we'll need to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 19:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fitbryceadams (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my article was deleted due to Unambiguous advertising, when my article contained direct references from business insider and The Washington Post. and also follows the same layout as other creators wiki pages i have referenced. i did declare my page as a COI. now my most recent decline admin yamala said my username is deemed inappropriate along with the photos in my article in which they are absolutely not. the words FIT BRYCE ADAMS is not inappropriate. the word fit means working out - bryce is a name and adams is a name. what about what is inappropriate. and regarding the 2 photos in my original draft if the next admin can reference those, they are absolutely not inappropriate what so ever. im only trying to work with the admins to take the necessary steps to publish a article in which i was given no time to learn and adjust before to even do so. the inconsistency with the admin decisions are not respectable, i dont think anyone has consistently given the same reasons as to why i cant continue to make necessary changes and publish my article Fitbryceadams (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We don't get to promote ourselves on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests from your currently active block. Do not do so again, please. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Fitbryceadams (talk) 13:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

I am writing to formally request a review and appeal of the block placed on my [fitbryceadams]. I understand that the block was imposed due to conflict of interest with my article that i declared, and I would like to address this issue and seek your assistance in resolving it.

Since the block was imposed, I have reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines, and im engaging in constructive editing

I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and contributing positively to the community. I have taken the time to review Wikipedia’s policies on and I am dedicated to ensuring that my future contributions align with these standards.

I kindly request that the block be reviewed and lifted, allowing me to resume editing Wikipedia. If there are any additional steps I need to take or further clarifications required, please let me know, and I will be happy to comply.

Fitbryceadams (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fitbryceadams (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am writing to formally request a review and appeal of the block placed on my [fitbryceadams]. I understand that the block was imposed due to conflict of interest with my article that i declared, and I would like to address this issue and seek your assistance in resolving it.

Since the block was imposed, I have reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines, and im engaging in constructive editing

I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and contributing positively to the community. I have taken the time to review Wikipedia’s policies on and I am dedicated to ensuring that my future contributions align with these standards.

I kindly request that the block be reviewed and lifted, allowing me to resume editing Wikipedia. If there are any additional steps I need to take or further clarifications required, please let me know, and I will be happy to comply. Fitbryceadams (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you write this with an AI? 331dot (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC) no i referenced an appeal message from an experienced wiki editor on a forum on how to write a clearly sincere appeal message

GPTZero score: 95%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

very odd, i have reviewed the Wikipedia's policies and will abide by the rules, ive never written an article on wikipedia before so i wasnt able to learn and make adjustments before the speedy deletion block. i am open to working with the review editors moving forward on my article following the guidelines and seeking guidance from the admins before making edits to the article

You didn't properly reply to the question whether you are using AI. You sound like an AI which is the problem here. PhilKnight (talk) 15:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

no i am not an AI, and im not using an AI. also not really sure how i sound like an AI, im typing properly? maybe i sound too professional?? i have acknowledged everything in the past chats with the other admins .... im just trying to be transparent and clear with my messages so in can move forward with working the reviewers on writing and publishing my first wiki page 2603:9001:8601:FA19:A8F5:9E03:F0FD:7E0D (talk) 17:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) With respect, though, you're not here to help build an encyclopaedia (if that's what you mean by "writing and publishing [your] first wiki page"); you're here to promote yourself, which isn't the same thing. Note that you shouldn't be writing about yourself in the first place (see WP:AUTOBIO), and promotion of any kind is not allowed on Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)