FisayorMontana
May 2019 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Draft:Fisayor Montana. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. creffett (talk) 16:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Other accounts edit
Hi, would you please explain your relationship to LifeOfJake? TonyBallioni (talk) 03:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC) i am awfully sorry, I'm very sorry, i swear to God and on my mom life am awfully sorry, i learned my lessons and understand my wrongs, please forgive me and unblock this account, please am really very sorry FisayorMontana (talk) 04:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC) TonyBallion
May 2019 edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- I've blocked you since you lied to me about the relationship to the account I mentioned above. You share the same IP address and at least one device with them, so I have blocked both accounts. I'm willing to believe that that it may be more than one person, and that you didn't know editing the same topic area was not okay, but then you lied about it. Until you explain what is going on here, you'll remain blocked. When someone gives you a chance to explain, the correct thing to do is be truthful, not lie. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
i created two accounts and was using both to edit an article on wikipedia which i guess you suggested it was one person that's using multiple accounts to edit an account but i denied it which i deeply right, both accounts was blocked yesterday by you which i know i truly deserved to be blocked because i lied to you when i could have just told the truth. i admit i violated wikipedia policy by using multiple accounts to edit an article which i am really sorry as well. I admit that i did something wrong and i promised it will happen ever again, The block is really not necessary to stop me for causing further damages on wiki, i will always heed to the rules and policies of wikipedia and i will also not cause any further damages or disruption to wikipedia, I'd make useful contributions instead, I am asking for my user account FisayorMontana to be unblock, I'd be very Grateful if you can help me about this Sir TonyBallioni FisayorMontana (talk) 00:57, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
FisayorMontana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am awfully sorry from tge depth of my heart on my mother's life i am sorry please forgive me and unblock the pages i promise I'll never repeat it again on heavens please forgive me FisayorMontana (talk) 04:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
FisayorMontana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i understand the reason was blocked and i understand that i was against the policy,i was blocked because i lied about the relationship between me and User:LifeOfJake which i deeply regret my actions. I admit that i did something wrong and i promised it wouldn't happen ever again, The block is really not necessary to stop me for causing further damages on wiki, i will always bend to the rules and policies of wikipedia, I'd be very glad if my account can be unblock me,i will not cause disruption or damages and i will not go against the policy anymore instead I'll make useful contributions this is a promise from the depth of my heart and I'll always be a man of my words, I'd be very Grateful if my request is Granted, ThanksFisayorMontana (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
So you are sorry for using multiple accounts and then try to get both accounts unblocked? [1][2] All right then... MER-C 09:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|i understand the reason i was blocked for using multiple accounts to edit one article and i also admit that i went against the policy of wikipedia which i deeply regret my actions. I admit that i did something wrong and i promised it won't happen ever again, The block is really not necessary to stop me for causing further damages on wikipedia, i will always heed to the rules and policies of wikipedia and i will not cause further damages or disruptions to wikipedia, i swear to start making useful contributions to wikipedia FisayorMontana (talk) 23:18, 15 May 2019 (UTC)}
Blanking edit
Please do not remove declined unblock requests for currently active blocks. --Yamla (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- I understand, Thanks for the information Yamla FisayorMontana (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
FisayorMontana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i understand the reason i was blocked for using multiple accounts to edit one article and i also admit that i went against the policy of wikipedia which i deeply regret my actions. I admit that i did something wrong and i promised it won't happen ever again, The block is really not necessary to stop me for causing further damages on wikipedia, i will always heed to the rules and policies of wikipedia and i will not cause further damages or disruptions to wikipedia, i swear to start making useful contributions to wikipedia FisayorMontana (talk) 01:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The original block was supported by policy, and I do not believe that your continued participation is in the best interest of the project. UninvitedCompany 22:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|1=i understand the reason i was blocked for using multiple accounts to edit one article and i also admit that i went against the policy of wikipedia which i deeply regret my actions. I admit that i did something wrong and i promised it won't happen ever again, The block is really not necessary to stop me for causing further damages on wikipedia, i will always heed to the rules and policies of wikipedia and i will not cause further damages or disruptions to wikipedia, i swear to start making useful contributions to wikipedia}
- Please don't post multiple unblock requests, as it will not speed up the process - admins are all volunteers, so you will just have to be patient and wait. I have disabled the unneeded extra requests. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)