Firstmm5

Firstmm5, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Firstmm5! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Overunity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Overunity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overunity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 21:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

References

Hello, Firstmm5. I see you are adding some citations to the article Overunity. As it stands at the moment, not one of these is acceptable. Please review WP:IRS for why. Wikipedia, like any other user-contributed site, is not acceptable as a source, since it is not reliable. All your links to Wikipedia should be WP:Wikilinks directly in the text, not references. The blog is similarly not acceptable. And the Patent office link is a primary source, which is acceptable for some purposes: here it is probably OK for the purpose it is used, though a secondary source would be better; but it does not discuss the subject of the article, so it is not relevant in establishing notability. I am guessing that you have looked for independent reliable sources that discuss overunity and not found them, or you would have cited them. If this is the case, then the subject simply does not at present meet Wikipedia's criteria for notabililty, and I advise you to give up, at least for the present. If some mainstream journals pick it up and write about it, that will be different. --ColinFine (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

You really are wasting your time. Why not find some other articles to edit and learn how wikipedia works before coming back to overunity. GDallimore (Talk) 00:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:45, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

ANI complaint against user GDallimore

I have filed an ANI complaint against GDallimore. Your input would be appreciated. This users actions, as decribed there, are clearly designed to illicit conflict where none be needed. He has repeatedly posted condescending posts to my Talk page after being warned here, in addition to stalking edits throughout WP Damonthesis (talk) 18:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

I did find what you are talking about. It is the text in "capital letters" Yes, I see it! I would agree that it is harassing! I can tell you that it appears that GDallimore IS A PROBLEM AND NEEDS TO BE DELT WITH!! He twice deleted my entire article on Overunity, and it went to a wp "article flagged for deletion" debate, which by the way, I lost. As of this date, there is no article on the subject of "Overunity" or "Over Unity" All references to the term are linked to the article for "Perpetual Motion". It makes no sense at all! The two are only Vaguely similar. It is a very long stretch of the imagination to say that Overunity is the equivalent of Perpetual Motion! My own opinion of GDallimore is quite unflattering! However for me to put into type, my opinions, it would only give my enemy, ammunition. So, I do not allow myself to be lowered to his level and I maintain that his "inflated" opinion of himself, ultimately only goes against his credibility. I have great reservations, about anything that he claims. I am of the opinion that he is a complete fraud. He lists his credentials /experience as a Physicist and Patent Lawyer, and also claims to be a composer(?). Does that mean that he is also a musician?? I am convinced that he is none of the above and only flatters himself, thinking that he is! Maybe he has aspirations of being those things; but again, I am convinced that he amounts to Nothing!!!! Please let me know how things go, and keep me in the loop! Thanks!

Firstmm5 (talk) 04:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)