Fin108

Alexander Cornell du Houx

Please discuss ANY changes here before doing so. I see a lot of POV pushing around here. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Please see citations; facts not "point of view." Btw: "Avoid excessive emphasis: CAPITAL LETTERS are considered shouting and are virtually never appropriate." Please see Wikipedia: Talk Page Guidelines. Fin108 (talk) 17:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2015

Your addition to Alexander Cornell du Houx has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. bobrayner (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

I quote: "You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words." Bobrayner, Please study the difference between an external link and inside "content." There is a huge difference! One may be copyright infringement; the other definitely is not. If an external link to content for source citations were a copyright violation, Wikipedia could not exist. Now if the NBC video you are so keen remove as a reference were placed inside the Wikipedia page in question, then permission would be required. Also, please try to be civil and refrain from threatening editors, especially if they are trying to cite the facts. Copyright law is something I have studied. You will need to be more specific than generalized threats to make your case. Unless that video content somehow got inside Wikipedia, you should leave the source as cited. Fin108 (talk) 04:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)