User talk:Fernando18/Personal sandbox

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Christina geo

Peer Review

edit
Name of student reviewer ** Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian
Date of review 5/2/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Fernando18
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/5/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/5/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length
Image (needed/appropriate) Image not necessary
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) N/A
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Article information provided is accurate and infromative
Wikiformatting Nice Job!
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments Time to post !

Peer Review

edit
Name of student reviewer ** Wikipedia User: M.Caban
Date of review 5/2/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Fernando18
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/2/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/2/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) Image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate from the article
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The information was very accurate and helpful.
Wikiformatting Good on bullets
Grammar & composition None found
Other comments Excellent. Need proper citations.

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

edit

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Fernando Ramos Fernando18

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox#cite_ref-1

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/1/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/1/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): 3 sentences

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: bullets, list form

Grammar & composition: Perfect grammar and composition

Other comments: Great work! Very informative!

--Christina geo (talk) 20:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


Name of student reviewer * Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: Fernando18
URL of editor’s Userpage Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Name of student reviewer * Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review 5/1/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: CRamel16
URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fernando18/Personal_sandbox&action=edit&redlink=1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/1/2013
Date review submitted to instructor 5/1/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) Image not needed.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information provided was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic and added information was accurate.
Wikiformatting Good on bullets,not numbered, and no link.
Grammar & composition None found
Other comments good job