User talk:Fercho85/Archive 2

File:PDE3.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PDE3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

File:PDEBeach.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PDEBeach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Rosariocity landsat.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosariocity landsat.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 09:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Playa Unión, Rawson, Chubut. Homenaje a los colonos galeses

Copyright problems with File:Tango2.JPG

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Tango2.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from See the very poor image editing. This file is not own work, it is obviously stole - as all other images by this uploader are. See http://www.google.com/images?um=1&tbs=isch%3A1%2Cisz%3Aex%2Ciszw%3A816%2Ciszh%3A563&q=argentina, the image is not longer aviable but the thumbnail shows the same without this stupid stealing/watermark hiding.. As a copyright violation, File:Tango2.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Tango2.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Tango2.JPG and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Tango2.JPG with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Tango2.JPG.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Your uploads

Its quite obvious that all your uploads are stolen. Yes, I speak of stealing. If you have to remove watermarks to make your "its entirely my own work" claim true and not so easy to undiscover we can obviously forget any good faith assumptions , this is blatant stealing with some criminal intentions. You will recive a few notes the next minutes, im searching. --Martin H. (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from see watermark. As a copyright violation, File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Bolsacom rosario.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Bolsacom rosario.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Bolsacom rosario.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:TornadosBa.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:TornadosBa.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:TornadosBa.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:TornadosBa.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:TornadosBa.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:TornadosBa.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:TornadosBa.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Palacio fuentes.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Palacio fuentes.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa267/abraham_benyosef/Imagen075-1.jpg stolen via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=415834&page=16. As a copyright violation, File:Palacio fuentes.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Palacio fuentes.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Palacio fuentes.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Palacio fuentes.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Palacio fuentes.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:La favorita.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:La favorita.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from stolen from http://www.skyscraperlife.com/452831-post264.html. As a copyright violation, File:La favorita.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:La favorita.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:La favorita.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:La favorita.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:La favorita.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from see watermark. As a copyright violation, File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Bolsacom rosario.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Bolsacom rosario.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Bolsacom rosario.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Bolsacom rosario.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Aeropuertorosario.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Aeropuertorosario.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from stolen from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=5763442&postcount=1 (page of 2005). As a copyright violation, File:Aeropuertorosario.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Aeropuertorosario.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Aeropuertorosario.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Aeropuertorosario.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Aeropuertorosario.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Puerto rosario.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Puerto rosario.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from stolen of http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=30273478&postcount=862. As a copyright violation, File:Puerto rosario.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Puerto rosario.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Puerto rosario.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Puerto rosario.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Puerto rosario.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

If you upload an inappropriate image again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

The old uploads are not even cleaned out. I tagged:

• File:CBA.jpg
• File:BA1.jpg
• File:StreetBA.jpg
• File:PeopleBA.jpg
• File:SnowBA.jpg
• File:Pasta frola.jpg
• File:Puntadeleste.jpg
• File:Monumenry.jpg
• File:Planodelaplata.png
• File:Torreecipsa.jpg
• File:Rosario montage.jpg
• File:Inaguracionh.jpg
• File:Tba16.jpg
• File:TDESTE34.jpg
• File:Trenrosario bsas.jpg
• File:Estacion pueyrredon2.jpg - this and the above are the same copyvios uploaded to Commons with User:Ale4110
• File:Buquebus2.gif
• File:Skyline888.jpg
• File:Skyline889.jpg
• File:Calleflorida.jpg
• File:Tranvia35.jpg
• File:Galeria pacifico.jpg
• File:Villagralbel.jpg
• File:Plazamrodriguez2.jpg
• File:Plazamrodriguez.jpg
• File:Vistapuey.jpg
• File:Casa tipica villa pueyrredon2.jpg

I already nuked all "contribution" to Commons and I suggest that Wikipedia will do the same. Otherwise a deletion request on the rest of the files will follow. --Martin H. (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Don't use the word "vandalism" gratuitously

With this edit summary you described another editor's action as vandalism, but it was nothing of the kind. Please be more careful with your choice of words in the future. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Sube.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sube.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)