Felixlhk

Welcome!

Hello, Felixlhk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hovid Inc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E. Fokker (talk) 02:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hovid Inc

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hovid Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 02:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Ho Sue San

The article David Ho Sue San has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Visik (talk) 07:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Visik, I had add the reference, thanks! Felixlhk (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hovid Inc

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hovid Inc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Felixhk, I have restored this article for you. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the assistance!Felixlhk (talk) 06:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Hovid Inc for deletion

The article Hovid Inc is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hovid Inc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, just would like to express that Non-Notable is Western Country doesn't mean will be the same in Asia. This page is very related to the history of my hometown, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia. We just hope that having more people to know about the unique culture of Malaysia culture. Thanks! Felixlhk (talk) 06:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

David Ho Sue San

Hi Felixlhk, thanks for your message. I did check out the references you provide on the article. They look alright, but the article probably needs an expansion to meet more criteria for WP:BLP. The general notice on the page, stats Please do not remove this tag unless the article has at least one such source.

I think you met the criteria, so you can go ahead and remove the notice if you like. good luck. --Visik (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Will there be anything happen if I didn't remove the tag? If not, I did rather let the administrators to decide. Thanks! Felixlhk (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Felixlhk, you can remove the tag. If you don't then the people discussing WP:PROD will decide if it meets the criteria. I have removed the notice because the rules say you need at least one source. You have provided two. It would be nice if you could expand the article include more sources. I have made some minor fixes to the article. have a good one. --Visik (talk) 02:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, forgot to mention, the article is now a stub article. More references and expanding in more detail will help the article stand on its own. Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for more information. --Visik (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the assistance. Really learn a lot from you, thanks!Felixlhk (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Ho Yan Hor

No problem; as long as you're careful to make it neutral, and as long as you demonstrate that the company is important enough to be on Wikipedia, go ahead. It wasn't deleted as advertising: the reason for deletion is that you didn't show why the company was important enough to be in an encyclopedia. One question — are you the same person as Felix2011? Nyttend (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Nyttend, nope...I'm part of the team of IpohWorld.org, a group of people that like to spread out to the world about our hometown Ipoh, talking about the history of how the city grow from a small tin mining town to be a city nowadays, mostly aiming the history at about 150 years from now is my target. My research is more on Ipoh Homegrown Family Business that grow from a tiny herbal tea stall, hawker stall & tin-craft stall to some influential economy contributor to Ipoh growth.Felixlhk (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tocovid SupraBio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tocovid SupraBio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Chewette

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chewette, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://drugs-about.com/drugs-c/chewette-c.html. As a copyright violation, Chewette appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chewette has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chewette and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Chewette with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chewette.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of David Ho Sue San for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Ho Sue San is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ho Sue San until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StarM 13:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC)