Felixdevries717

Felixdevries717, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Felixdevries717! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Felixdevries717, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft Review

Hi Felixdevries717,

Your rough draft is coming along nicely! It is very interesting and full of information that I previously knew nothing about. You do a great job of formatting and organizing your article sections that make it easy to navigate. I could not find any grammatical errors (which is really impressive, especially with a scientific article), so that's also something you did really well. Overall, I was intrigued by the Death's head hawkmoth, and think it is a good article choice. Good work!

Critiques

My only critiques to give you would be in the "Behavior" section of the article, and maybe a slight variation in word choice. If possible, I would recommend expanding on the "Behavior" section. Right now it appears a little bare, but I'm sure you already know that. "Citations" or "References" aren't listed, although you do provide links within your draft. I know wiki automatically creates its own set of citations at the bottom, so you'll definitely want to separate those from the "Behavior" part of the article, in order to not confuse people. You have very descriptive word choices and I personally understand what you're saying, but others who aren't as familiar with certain anatomical terms might have trouble. This is something that you certainly don't have to change about the article (because the article itself is written very well), but if you want to have a broader audience, this could be something to consider.

--Lilybean896 (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2018 (UTC)