User talk:Felipe Menegaz/Archive 14

Home Talk Archive Tests Awards

< Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15 >

All Pages:

1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  10 -  11 -  12 -  13 -  14 -  15 -  16 -  17 -  18 -  ... (up to 100)

Great Power Hey Felipe, remember me. Have you been able to find any sources that says Brazil or India are great powers? Deavenger (talk) 03:38, 29 April 2009 (UTC) I had forgotten this, so I does not search. As my time is short and I'm involved in other matters, I can not do the research right now. Reegards; Felipe ( talk ) 15:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC) Okay. I'll keep on looking to see if I can find any source that says these countries are great powers. Deavenger (talk) 01:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009 From the editor: Writers needed Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera Features and admins: Approved this week Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics I will be happy to give the article a review. I'll give it a first pass tomorrow before I head out of town for the weekend. One thing that does immediately jump out is that you've probably over-cited the article. For instance, there is no need to use four citations for a statement as simple as "The BOC's President, Carlos Arthur Nuzman, and then mayor of Rio de Janeiro, César Maia, approved the choice, making Rio de Janeiro the Brazilian postulant city to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics." That isn't a criteria against a GA nom, so I won't worry about it in a review, but I do find that all of the citation numbers detract from the readability a little. Anyway, I'll mark myself as reviewing, and will have my thoughts for you tomorrow. Cheers, Resolute 21:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC) I've reviewed the article, and left my comments here. Only some very minor concerns at this point, and I expect I will be passing it next week. Regards, Resolute 15:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC) Hey, João. I left you a reply on my talk page. Parutakupiu (talk) 23:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC) I personally would remove them, but at the same time, it isn't something that I'll worry too much about when I do my second review... I will try to do that tonight, as I really only have the time right now (at work) to monitor for vandalism. Resolute 16:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC) You're welcome! As far as a FA nom goes, I'd say to hold off until after the host city is selected. There may well be concern about the stability of this article given how close the vote is. Personally, I would pare down the citations a bit as well. As mentioned above, three or four citations for a simple statement breaks the text and hampers readability. That would be an issue for some reviewiers at FAC. Tony1 has several good self use guides for prose quality, and a peer review might be of assistance - though in my experience good PRs are hard to find. The biggest challenge you will face is the technical quality of the prose, and given that is one of my weaknesses, I can't help you much there. Good luck! Resolute 00:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009 License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace? WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations Features and admins: Approved this week Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC) Well done on the Rio de Janeiro Bid article Hey just wanted to congratulate you on getting the Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics to Good Article status. In the on-going effort to improve articles related to the Olympic Games it's always encouraging to see another article attain Good status. Keep up the good work. H1nkles (talk) 22:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009 From the editor: Browsing the archives Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more Features and admins: Approved this week Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC) Please help update St. Peter and Paul Rocks and Fernando de Noronha Hi, I see that you are involved with WP Brazil, and I've asked a few members if could you help in cleaning up the red-links and missing citations in these 2 articles? Your help in translating the references is needed, and due to recent events, these articles are very important. Thanks much! --Funandtrvl (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC) License tagging for File:Felipe Menegaz.PNG Thanks for uploading File:Felipe Menegaz.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC) ITN 2009 FIFA Confederations Cup Final has been updated. Felipe Menegaz 16:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC) The article now contains one sentence regarding the match's action: Despite being two goals down at half-time, Brazil won the match 3–2, with Lúcio scoring the winning goal six minutes from full-time. As a point of reference, our Super Bowl XLIII article was in this state before it was linked from ITN. In particular, see the game summary. I'm not saying that we need something that extensive, but one sentence really isn't sufficient. —David Levy 18:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Argentina Yes, 100,000 cases. Did you revert it? --190.50.109.66 (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Request Hi Felipe! I would like your opinion on two articles that I am currently watching: Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago and Pedro II. On the first, there is a user who is insisting in renaming the article to Saint Peter and Saint Paul rocks, even though the official sources (i.e. the Brazilian Government and the Brazilian Navy) name it an archipelago (note: after 1998 when it started to be permanently occupied the Brazilian Government changed the name from "Penedos de São Pedro e São Paulo" to "Arquipélago de São Pedro e São Paulo"). The second article has to do mainly with the infobox picture of Emperor Pedro II. The User:Lecen has literally taken ownership of the article (he has made great improvements though), and won't allow anyone to change it. Regarding the picture, it is a low quality image depicting the Emperor in normal civilian clothing. There are many pictures of Pedro II in regalia or uniform, in higher quality, and more suitable for a Monarch. Please let me know what you think, and if possible leave an opinion at the articles' talk pages. Thanks, Felipe! Limongi (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC) P.S.: I have 'stolen' your old signature (the one with the Brazilian flag), since you don't seem to be using it anymore. ;) Hope that's ok. Limongi (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Thanks, Felipe! I've left my opinion at the talk page. Limongi (talk) 01:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC) Hello, Felipe Menegaz. You have new messages at Limongi's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. x 2 Talkback Hello, Felipe Menegaz. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Re: Evaluation of the Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics Thanks, will re-review eventually. Cheers, –Juliancolton | Talk 20:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC) Yes, that change would help this article become a list. Though I would say that as a list of all bidding cities, I'd prefer to see the scope changed to reflect that it discusses all bidding cities as well. Cheers, 1 Resolute 17:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Given the backlog at GAN, if I review more articles, I will probably start with ones that have been waiting longest. Perhaps once I am finished with an article I am working to take to FAC, I will pick up more GA reviews, but it may be a little while. cheers, Resolute 03:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1965).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1966).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1969).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1975).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (1985).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (2000).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (2005).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Can You? In the page Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics you appear to have made a Revision as of 04:15, 17 August 2009 by editing and adding text and sources to the article. One of those citations that was added is causing a cite error. Could you please go back and fill out the full source information for the reference tag <ref name="IOC WG 2"/>? Thanks. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 16:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Globo Network Logo (2005).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Felipe Menegaz. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page. Message added 00:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks! Thanks for the barnstar. Happy to help. Geraldk (talk) 15:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Congratulations Thank you I'm happy to hear that 2007 Pan American Games medal table was promoted nominated to Featured List, and I thank you for the barnstar. That was very kind, and I appreciate it. Finetooth (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Oops. I was sleepy, hurried, and didn't read closely. (I may have to forfeit my proofreader's license.) So, the thank you still stands, and I wish you good luck at FLC. Finetooth (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)