Please refrain from vandalization on the Wikipedia page Han-Bin. The page references those who use the Korean name Han-Bin and is not restricted to birth name or ethnicity.

The infromation you have removed is both factual and appropriate for the page, and removal constitutes vandalism.

The page will continue to be corrected upon further vandalization. Thank you. Jayb.rd98 (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from vandalism edit

Wikipedia includes pseudonyms as a part of a page's accepted list.

For an example of this please reference Bachman (Surname) where Stephan King's pseudonym is listed. Removing a factual and correct name from the list is considered vandalism. Jayb.rd98 (talk) 07:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fei111 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was accused of sock puppetry when I am not. I was making multiple edit to the Hanbin name given related page. Under this page, It’s clearly stated “ Korean masculine given name. Its meaning differs based on the hanja used to write each syllable of the name. There are 23 hanja with the reading "han" and 25 hanja with the reading "bin" on the South Korean government's official list of hanja which may be used in given names.” Ngo Ngoc Hung isn’t Korean nor was birth given the name Hanbin under the South Korea government official list. This was given to him by a company when he joined the survival show in mnet. It isn’t right to add him to this list. I was blocked for an unreasonable accuse. Ngo Ngoc Hung is a Vietnamese born and raised with a birth given name of Ngo Ngoc Hung.

Decline reason:

First, a denial of sockpuppetry is insufficient to persuade us to unblock you, as of course every sock puppet would say that, and if we accepted users' say-so on that one, well, what would be the point of having an anti-sockpuppet policy then? Second, if you're not a sock of Beran111, how is it that his edits show the same fixation on that one article and that one edit, which you very much encourage by devoting the rest of your request to repeating, as if that were perhaps more important to you than clearing yourself of the sockpuppetry allegation. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Fei111 (talk) 10:06, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply