Fayssaloss

Your submission at Articles for creation: BeTravelwise (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BeTravelwise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BeTravelwise, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Fayssaloss! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BeTravelwise (August 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Evan Luthra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Evan Luthra, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evan Luthra (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evan Luthra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Evan Luthra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:34, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Reason of rejection

Hello Mr Robert, Can you please tell me the reason behind the rejection of Evan Luthra article. While not having any connection with the subject, I believe they meet notability criteria being featured in several famous independent sources: Forbes Entrepreneur.com Crunchbase Angelist Startups.com And also having more than 650k followers in Instagram only with a verified accounts. The subject passed also in multiple TV shows and talked in highly recognized conferences like TEDx. Thanks Fayssaloss (talk) 00:11, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Courtesy ping:@Robert McClenon:. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 21:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

User:Fayssaloss, User:Victor Schmidt - I will take another look at the draft shortly, but looking only at this page and my memory, I have two comments. First, the article was deleted two years ago, and there is no indication that they have become notable in the past two years. They weren't notable two years ago, and the draft doesn't show new achievements. Second, I see sources listed that are not considered independent and reliable, such as Crunchbase. Also, Wikipedia does not have any guideline for notability based on social media followers. The previous deletion is what was decisive. The community already considered notability once. We can discuss drafts of articles that were previously deleted at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:12, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I have added new infos and sources. I fully agree that a number of followers in Social Media is not a criteria. However, in just the past 2 years, the subject passed in several TV shows like the famous "Zone Interdite" in the biggest french TV channel. Fayssaloss (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello I've read your explanation in the other discussion. Thanks for the clarification. I will need so just I don't repeat the same mistakes with future pages.

I have added some reliable sources & removed deprecated ones like DailyMail. Thanks Fayssaloss (talk) 17:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Somdutta Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Somdutta Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somdutta Singh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evan Luthra (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EggOfReason were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evan Luthra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Evan Luthra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 17:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello Fayssaloss. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Somdutta Singh, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fayssaloss. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fayssaloss|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Mz7 (talk) 22:25, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Sorry but It's a weird remark. For the Somdutta Singh page, I was connected to the person to whom the subject is a client, but I wasn't paid. It was voluntary. Thanks Fayssaloss (talk) 22:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evan Luthra (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Evan Luthra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Evan Luthra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Request: Unblock my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fayssaloss (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I confirm that I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. Currently, I'm not being compensated by any person or organization to make edits or create pages. When I got any paid editing job, I will adhere to disclosure requirements. I'm since a Wikipedia editor since 2013. My primary goal is to improve the content of the encyclopedia, through creating & editing pages about persons and topics I know and I'm sure the admissibility criteria. For the pages I have made edits for, there is only Somdutta Singh, where I've got in touch with her media manager, but it wasn't at all a paid editing. I've received multiple paid jobs proposals but refused them all, as I figured out they don't meet our criteria. Thanks

Decline reason:

Editing pattern suggests undisclosed paid editing. I do not feel you are being honest in your responses here. only (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fayssaloss (talk) 21:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Fayssaloss, Why did you get in touch with Singh's editor then? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

He got in touch with me because hé'e was struggling with creating the page. That's all !

When I checked by a simple Google search I found that the subjec is admissible. I wanted to help.

Thanks Fayssaloss (talk) 09:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. The fact that you have been in contact with the subject establishes a relationship even if it is not on a paid basis.

The over-zealous acts of resubmitting a draft when issues have not been resolved and the fervor to "get it published" by a single purpose account raises red flags. Generally, when a subject is seeking to have an article published that is a big red flashing sign. The subject, or someone associated with him or her, generally cannot be neutral enough.

We always seek and want new editors so if you are allowed to resume editing I would advise not jumping into creating articles before becoming more familiar with the policies and guidelines and being open to following through with suggestions (WP:Collaboration) so as to not be considered stubborn, hardheaded, or not here to build an encyclopedia. If an editor, or multiple editors in this case, question notability then clear proof needs to be shown, by significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources, or it would be advisable to just drop it. Otr500 (talk) 13:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you very much.

I'm just forcing articles creation when I believe they meet criteria and should be in Wikipedia.

I'm just jealous to see other websites proposing info about a notable subject while Wikipedia no. (I already know that not all subjects will have an article in Wikipedia)

Can you please tell me about my account status?

Thanks

Fayssaloss (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

Please tell me why you blocked my account while I've never been paid for any edit I've made. Fayssaloss (talk) 17:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evan Luthra (August 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Two reviewers have previously noted, in declining this draft, that it has too many unreliable sources, such as YouTube and Facebook. It still has too many unreliable sources.

While the subject has had activities in the past two years, since an AFD discussion decided that the subject is not notable, this draft does not establish that the subject has become notable in the past two years. The experience appears to be more of the same, which was not notable two years ago, and is still not notable.

Even if the subject is notable, this draft is not likely to become an article as long as it is being resubmitted by the same editor, with a mixture of reliable and unreliable sources. If the subject is notable, this draft should be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion, it is recommended that it be deleted again, and that a topic-ban be considered.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Evan Luthra

Draft:Evan Luthra, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Evan Luthra and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Evan Luthra during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:BeTravelwise

Hello, Fayssaloss. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BeTravelwise, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:BeTravelwise

Hello, Fayssaloss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BeTravelwise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Evan Luthra

Hello, Fayssaloss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Evan Luthra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)