Fashomecca
Fashomecca (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i dont understand why i was blocked, no reason was posted in my talk page. what is going on Fashomecca (talk) 19:37, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Hi, You don't appear to be blocked, at least not on this named account - can you please tell us the exact message you get when you try to edit? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thank you for your reply. this is the exact message that i get when i try to MOVE my page: You cannot move pages because your account is too new or is blocked from editing. If you would like a page to be moved and you are not blocked, you can list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please do not just copy and paste the contents of the page to a new title, as that destroys the edit history of the page.
Fashomecca (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Mr. case, thank you for your reply. this is the EXACT message that i get when i try to MOVE my page: "You cannot move pages because your account is too new or is blocked from editing. If you would like a page to be moved and you are not blocked, you can list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please do not just copy and paste the contents of the page to a new title, as that destroys the edit history of the page." Fashomecca (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, because you are not blocked. The reason you cannot move pages is because your account is too new - you need to be autoconfirmed, that is you need to have been registered for at least 4 days and have made at least 10 edits before you are able to move pages. You can either wait another day and then do it, or follow the instructions and request the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves - or if you tell me what page you want moved and where to I'll check it and do it for you. But you are not blocked, and don't need to make any more unblock requests - just add a comment below, and I'll see it because I'm watching this page -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
February 2013 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Glitch art, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please also see WP:OR. freshacconci talktalk 18:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Glitch art. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. freshacconci talktalk 21:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
ok, i will add my sources now.
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Glitch art. Eyesnore 21:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
now you have me confused. you asked me to add my sources which i did. can you please explain what i need to do differently? thank you
- You do understand that simply adding any old source is not what we're talking about? Nam June Paik, for example, is not a Glitch artist and the source you provide makes no claim. Artists can't be "claimed" for a movement. You need proper sources that state that the artist is part of glitch art. Leave the list out. And please sign your hame with four tildes and use edit summaries. freshacconci talktalk 21:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Please also look at WP:RS and WP:OR. Facebook, for example, is not a reliable source. The sources used need to say that the artist is a glitch artist and the sources themselves need to be proper sources, with no affiliation with the subject. freshacconci talktalk 21:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Excuse me, but Nam jun Paik absolutely IS a glitch artist.
- According to you. Did He ever claim to be a glitch artist? Is there a reliable source available that makes that claim? If not, then we can't make that claim. And please sign your name and use edit summaries. It's proper etiquette.freshacconci talktalk 21:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
whats an edit summary? how do u sign your name?
- When you make an edit there's a box just below the content box that's says "Summary"> You indicate what your edit is about. You sign your name using four tildes (~). I'll post a welcome message here which will give you some more info about editing. freshacconci talktalk 21:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
Hello, Fashomecca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! freshacconci talktalk 21:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Edit summary needed edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Frze > talk 10:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Use Preview button edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to John DeFazio , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Frze > talk 10:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of John DeFazio for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John DeFazio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John DeFazio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)