Fangy94

Speedy deletion nomination of Magnus Böcker

Hello Fangy94,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Magnus Böcker for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Fangy94, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Fangy94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia talk:Teahouse, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. At the top of the page which you edited it says: "This page is for discussing the Teahouse, please direct questions about Wikipedia to the Teahouse Q&A forum." --David Biddulph (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Magnus Böcker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magnus Böcker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Böcker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:16, 29 November 2016 (UTC)