Fadedbetta

Your edits to the cisgender article

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Asarelah (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

My changing your edits is not a personal attack. The Cisgender article has nothing to do with mythical birds, mythical creatures, or Where the Wild Things Are, therefore your edits are unconstructive. Please read the link about Wikipedia:Vandalism. Nor does it have anything to do with Chimeras. Please stop making unconstructive edits. Asarelah (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your civil reply. You are certainly entitled to your opinion regarding the concept of cisgender, however, you cannot simply place it into folkloric categories merely because you disagree with it. Cisgender is not a folkloric concept, it is an academic and political concept. However, if you can find criticism of the concept of cisgender from published, reliable sources, by all means put it in. Please see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information regarding what is appropriate, and what is not. Google scholar and google books are a good way to find sources. I'm also somewhat baffled as to why you consider the article poorly sourced, I skimmed the references and they all look like they come from peer-reviewed journals. Asarelah (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

P.S. - If you want to add new comments to my talk page, please place them at the bottom. I have cut and pasted your other comments there. Thank you. Asarelah (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Cisgender AFD

Please do not attempt to add old deletion debates to new ones. The article has been nominated for deletion before, in 2006. Since this is the second such debate, it gets its own page. Attempting to add old discussion, as you did here, does little to prove your points regarding the article - and, indeed, gives the appearance of shenanigans. There have already been concerns raised about your editing in this area, and it's really really easy to get blocked from editing for disruption. Please do be careful. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 16:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Your feedback on "Cisgender"

Thanks for posting your feedback on "Cisgender".

You posted this comment on 13 November 2012 (view all feedback).

Biased

What parts did you find biased and what do you want to see changed?

czar ♔ 01:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)