Factually

Welcome!

Hello Factually, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  – Chacor 09:15, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Singapore. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Chacor 09:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The sources are verifiable. Your edits to remove valid information, albeit "in a negative light", are not tolerated on Wikipedia. They are biased to you, but if we remove them the whole article becomes biased in the other way. We cannot accept that. – Chacor 04:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Please read WP:V and WP:RS. If it's verifiable and comes from a reliable source it shouldn't be excluded. Bias POV has no place here. We are presenting both sides. – Chacor 09:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding, we have to be as unbiased as possible. Those seem legit, so they can be included. The population estimate doesn't have to be changed though, it's just a rough number. – Chacor 09:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)