Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Kinu t/c 07:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fabulouers (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Given this account’s short edit history, it’s unfortunate their are still people on Wikipedia who have nothing better to then target and block new editors at random. I have nothing to do with Kingshowman and I have every reason to create another username and continue editing. After all, Wikipedia touts itself as an encyclopedia anybody can edit and I will not allow you to rob us new users of the ability to do that. Fabulouers (talk) 12:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If that's what you are going to do, then there is nothing further to discuss. "Anybody can edit" does not mean any person can make any edit they wish at any time they wish under any circumstances without restriction. 331dot (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fabulouers (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The point I’m trying to make is that the person who blocked me was acting unfairly and instead of discussing why he/she thinks this account belongs to kingshowman, blocked without warning. The burden of proof rests with them

Decline reason:

If you wish to be unblocked, the burden of proof rests with you. See WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Note that you'll likely only get one more chance. Yamla (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Callanecc and Yamla: Okay, if you wanna treat Wikipedia like a video game and play cat and mouse, then I’m up to the challenge. Because this username was unfairly blocked, I’ll just make another one. Simple as that. I think guys like you take this Sockpuppetry bullshit way too seriously. Fabulouers (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.