FRANKTEJON

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to QR code has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: QR code was changed by FRANKTEJON (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888974 on 2016-12-17T04:34:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to QR code. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 🎅Patient Crimbo🎅 ^{grotto presents} 17:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at QR code ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

• Just to be clear, a blog post where somebody claims to be the inventor of something is not a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 17:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)