FLN05

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, FLN05, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your initial contributions do not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Ckatz^chat_spy 08:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ckatz^chat_spy 23:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Again, another warning. Do not change the map colour, which is a standard colour used in all Canadian provincial and territorial articles. Your edits are clearly based on a specific POV, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Further incidents may result in a loss of editing privileges. --Ckatz^chat_spy 04:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to threaten you over this, FLN05, just advising you that it would be trouble if you kept doing it. My personal opinion is that it should be blue, but as a neutral contributor to Wikipedia, I know that it must remain a color that reflects WP:NPOV. I would hope that you understand; you're talking with one who is descended from Louis Hebert, so I understand the passion, but not the execution of it. Monsieurdl ^{mon talk} 22:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Final warning - any future disruptive edits will result in a loss of editing privileges. --Ckatz^chat_spy 09:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for You have been cautioned against single-purpose POV edits, and have also ignored the established discussions and consensus regarding Quebec.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ckatz^chat_spy 22:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FLN05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I am blocked for political reason. Quebecers form a Nation within Canada, it is a fact. The Federal government of Canada and all medias agreed to that, it is official and I have 4 references... Because of their distinct culture and language Quebecers form a nation within Canada.?Now you always told me to go to the discussion page, wich I did and you are the only one who respond saying the same thing you do now. You don't own this article and I don't understand why you want to hide the fact that Quebecers form a Nation. You are the one who does not make constructive contributions. You make Anti-Quebecers propaganda. If you don't unblock me and restore my contributions I will make a complaint against you. You are not qualified to be administrator you must forget your political ideas and accept the fact that Quebecers form a Nation within Canada.

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for your politics, you were blocked for edit warring. It's not that long of a block anyway, I suggest you find something else to occupy your time so you can come back refreshed and ready to make positive contributions when it is over. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment Spurious and unfounded "political" accusations aside, you have been blocked because of your blatant single-purpose editing style, your refusal to respect an established consensus at Talk:Quebec, and your repeated reverts to restore your edits. You are of course entitled to challenge the block, as per the steps outlined above, but I believe your contribution history will speak for itself. --Ckatz^chat_spy 22:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

I believe you are a English Pro-Canada and Anti-Quebecers. There is no consensus, everytime I write at Talk:Quebec people agreed with me, you are the only one who does not. So I believed I had the right to make the change. Your personal opinion is not more important because you are administrator. In fact your personnal opinion is irrelevant. Quebecers form a Nation within Canada, it is a really important fact and it must be at the beginning. Just like we agreed on the consensus on the French version. For the color of the map no wiki-laws said that all Canadian provinces should be from orange color. Québec is different and that is what Canada is about, diversity. In fact I could say you are Orangemen and that this color is not neutral. I feel insulted by it because the majority of Quebecer people are catholic and the Orange Order are anti catholic. This is not a joke, I am serious, the word Orangemen is a synonymous of racist, they are the founder of the Canadian Confederation in 1867, they killed Louis Riel! You want to make something useful for Canadian unity, respect the fact that Quebecers form a Nation within Canada and learn french. I do not care about what is write on Québec page. I just want people to see there is a debate and that some English try to hide fact about Québec National issue. I do not do vandalism and I didn't broke the 3 revert rule policy. Just unblock me and let me explain myself on the discussion page of Québec at least. Thank you. FLN05 (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2009 (EST)

reverting my decline of your unblock

You may make another unblock request if you wish, but you can't remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Just copy and paste the references outside the unblock request, it's a matter of the formatting in template that happens when the request is denied. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok sorry, I didn't know. FLN05 (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2009 (EST)

Ckatz^chat_spy 04:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock}}

I don't care if I am block, I just want to know what make you think you have the right to erase a full paragraph and 2 references on the Réseau de Résistance du Québécois article? Also why you put the word, SMALL, when no reference defined the group as small? Your last modification see here is vandalism, you cannot erase text and reference like that. Sockpuppet or not it does not justify Vfp15 vandalism on the RRQ page. I only tried to protect it, you blocked me and then restored the vandalised version!? I ask you to restore the article before it was vandalised by Vfp15. Thank You.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FLN05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't care if I am block, I just want to know what make you think you have the right to erase a full paragraph and 2 references on the Réseau de Résistance du Québécois article? Also why you put the word, SMALL, when no reference defined the group as small? Your last modification is vandalism, you cannot erase text and reference like that. Sockpupet or not it does not justify Vfp15 vandalism on the RRQ page. I only tried to protect it, you blocked me and then restored the vandalised version!? I ask you to restore the article before it was vandalised by Vfp15. Thank You.

Decline reason:

Not a valid request for unblock. Closedmouth (talk) 13:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.