This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fêmea Fatal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 170.79.120.49. Fêmea Fatal (talk) 17:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. You'll need to shut that off if you wish to edit here. Yamla (talk) 23:37, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Scottish charts edit

I actually update these every week, or did until you decided you were going to start last week for whatever reason. Nobody has claims over what content to add to Wikipedia but quite frankly you don't appear to have heeded the advice I gave you last week when I tagged you in an edit summary to adapt the date formats to the page you're adding content to. You even "thanked" me for said edit, so you saw it, but you evidently just don't care enough to do it. Please don't bother attempting to add charts if you're not going to do it properly, because it's a waste of time for others to correct you. Thanks. Ss112 17:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you recently removed content from Los Angeles without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Donald Albury 00:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Portland, Oregon, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

1991–2020 normals for United States edit

I have reverted your edits for the Washington weatherbox template since right now, NOAA is still using the 1981-2010 data and the 1991-2020 normals has not been published yet (they are planning to release it next month, May 2021). Normals are different from averages because normals accounts for any data issues (e.g. missing values, instrumentation error, etc) that averages (from the monthly summarized data as it is simply an arithmetic mean) does not account for missing data/data quality issues. Ssbbplayer (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please don't remove mean temps in the new York City weatherbox. Mean temps are a standard feature across many cities around the world.Ssbbplayer (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Denver, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Windsor, Ontario - Logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Windsor, Ontario - Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 06:45, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply