Express-ion Surat, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Express-ion Surat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atul Bakery edit

Hello Express-ion Surat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Atul Bakery for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:02, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Express-ion Surat

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nyttend (talk) 04:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Express-ion Surat (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Sir, SDB is the one of the biggest diamond trading centre & I was asked by the members association to edit the existing page to give appropriate information as per the website created. Same with my other contributions. None of my contributions will be for advertising or promotions. It will be for information which people around would be interested in knowing, and also it is on request by multiple citizens belonging to Surat city & are now settled across the world. Hence, I would kindly request you to unblock my account & assuring you that none of the contributions here are intended for any promotions or advertising. talk

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not interested in what organizations want to say about themselves, and given your admission that you were writing at the organization's behest, you need to read WP:COI and WP:PAID. But even saying that, given the blatantly promotional/marketing tone of your additions to Surat Diamond Bourse, you will not be unblocked if that is all you intend to write about. If there is something else you would like to help us with here, please make a new unblock request and tell us what it is.

I'll also add that the article you created about Atul Bakery was blatant promotion/marketing/puffery too, and writing in that style is firmly prohibited here. Do you have any connection with Atul Bakery? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:49, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for your email. As far as Atul Bakery, the article contained statements such as "focusing solely on customer satisfaction" and "Having 11 years experience of Restaurant Industry and a goal to serve the best". If I undeleted the article and removed these and similar promotional components, the article would have virtually nothing left, and it would need to be expanded with reliable sources to demonstrate why it would pass our inclusion standards. And Boing! has given a good summary of the issues with the diamond article. Nyttend (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Express-ion Surat (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

being a novice, i was unaware of the information which is allowed in wikipedia. I shall take care of the policies henceforth. Requesting you to unblock my account, so that I can restart contributing to Wikipedia with only appropriate, non-promotional information. Please let me know if there is any other reason to be still blocked indefinitely. Regarding my previous contributions, it is fine to place to speedy deletions, wrt your policies.

Decline reason:

Given that you work for a marketing company advertising online content creation (whose clients include Atul Bakery, I notice, which means you were violating Wikipedia's Terms of Use when you created that page) it seems very likely that you would continue to write about your clients again if unblocked. You are not a "novice", you are a marketing professional trying to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes (and being deceitful about it into the bargain). That is more than sufficient reason to block you indefinitely. Yunshui  08:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.