Welcome

edit
Hello, Expertseeker90! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dawnseeker2000 00:30, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

October 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Gyrofrog. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Somalia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 08:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Indio, California, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Citations needed in US Woodland

edit

Please do not remove citations needed tags without very good cause; the presence of such a tag indicates that a claim has been challenged, so a citation is necessary.

Further, as noted by other editors here on this talk page, please be very careful not to add claims that have already been subject to challenge - calling US Woodland "M81" has been intensely, even angrily, argued over by a number of editors (not me, as it happens). Therefore, adding such a claim without evidence is undesirable.

The rule of thumb for content editing is to provide a citation for every fact - it's much easier to do this when you are consulting a source, than to try to retrieve the source reference after the fact. All the best --- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Enough with the "M81" fanboy nonsense

edit

Woodland camouflage was NEVER called "M81" by ANY component of the US Department of Defense.

Stop your useless insertion of this crap into camouflage articles. If it's "M81" cite just a single instance of this usage from someone authoritative. Hong Kong airsoft gear-peddlers and videogame circlejerkers do not count. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.185.105 (talk) 13:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Member states of the Warsaw Pact, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Member states of the Warsaw Pact

edit
 

Hello Expertseeker90. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Member states of the Warsaw Pact".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Member states of the Warsaw Pact}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of California wildfires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Desert Combat Boot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Desert Combat Boot) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Desert Combat Boot, Expertseeker90!

Wikipedia editor Cornellier just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider merging as commented on talk page.

To reply, leave a comment on Cornellier's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of October 1993 California wildfires

edit
 

The article October 1993 California wildfires has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page is entirely WP:OR with no sources and not about a particular fire.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:32, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Expertseeker90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, HMHS Britannic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your maps

edit

Hello, I am a fan of the new maps you have been adding to Wikipedia, but was wondering if you could make a version of your map without any borers at all, and just showing lakes and oceans. I was also wondering if you could make borders clearer on your WWII map, for example the General Government. Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JWarrenator (talkcontribs) 17:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Expertseeker90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply