Examine Snocrates Olfactorys intent

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Examine Snocrates Olfactorys intent (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't blocked for being a sockpuppet of "user Jsmith," I was blocked because an anonymous coward who goes by the usernames GoodOlfactory and Snocrates and so forth, is desperate to censor facts about a "living person" he wants to slander in the pages of Wikipedia. Simple as that.

Decline reason:

Obvious sockpuppet. – Luna Santin (talk) 09:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2009 block

You have been blocked from editing for being a sockpuppet of User:Jsmith 51389. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 04:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Give it up Snocrates all you're doing is digging your own hole deeper. Administrators: Of course this block is unjustified, unfair and simply an exercise in malice by sockpuppeteer GoodOlfactory ETC. If this ridiculousness doesn't stop before Jimmy Wales learns of it, I bet it will stop as soon as he does learn of it. Examine Snocrates Olfactorys intent (talk) 04:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

You must be confusing me with someone else. I've no malice against you, but we're not going down the same road you took Wikipedia down before w.r.t. Temple Lot and related articles. I know there are some editors who are upset with you, but that's primarily because in the past you've deceptively used multiple accounts, made legal threats against WP and WP users, etc. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 08:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)