Welcome!

Hello, EvilOne93, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Zynga deletions edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you have flagged up a number of pages related to gaming, particularly browser-based video game by Zynga. It would be useful if you could explain why you are doing this, as it is likely to raise concerns that your edits are in fact biased against Zynga. I would also like to draw your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games where it would be great if you could contribute.Leutha (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
It is clear that you are either a sockpuppet or a troll; either way, the behaviour you have exhibited is not acceptable. Ironholds (talk) 07:38, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EvilOne93 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely for a ridiculous reason. This Admin clearly abused his or her power and blocking someone indefinitely for a first offence (I didn't even do anything wrong) is unacceptable and is rather unjustified. The said blocking Admin also accused me of being a sock puppet without even providing valid proof, and blocked me on this basis.EvilOne93 (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Having looked at contributions of the user, and contributions of the IP, this appears to be a wholly appropriate and in-policy block. Note that "admin abused powers" unblock requests will almost never be successful - this process is about your actions, and when their actions appear to be appropriate, you're simply left with having made ridiculous accusations that will taint any future request (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.