Everyguy
- Welcome to Wikipedia! You are only the second Unificationist to sign in and actually work on any articles, that I know of - me being the first. I work with Bruce Grodner and Frank Kaufmann in New York.
- As of next month I shall have been at Wikipedia for 4 years. I know everybody and everything! Well, almost. If there's anything I can do for you, please let me know. Uncle Ed 23:30, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Hey Everyguy you commented on me changing the Mount Pleasant article, I do live in the area and the information should not be considered vandalism as it is very relevant to the environment of the school atmosphere. Please allow me to inform others of the coined term due to the fact that it is based on pure statistics.
Hey Everyguy. I was wondering why you changed the Pascack Valley topic... it was true. I witnessed the scare firsthand, but I am wondering why you went and changed it.
How are you, David,
Just wondering if you might be able to help with an English to Japanese article translation...
Best, Robert Res q68 03:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I only do Japanese to Engish. You'll always want to have a person translate into his or her native language, so you should probably be looking for a native speaker of Japanese.
David Everyguy 02:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Banzan edit
Hi David. If you have time, could you translate the Kumazawa Banzan article from Japanese to English please? Dalobuca 18:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Projection lithography edit
Hi,
You wrote a pretty good article at Stepper, but I think it should be titled Projection lithography. Please comment on the talk page. --Smack (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey! edit
Based on your comment at the Hooah talk page, I recommend that you add your name to Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by military branch. Oh, and HOOAH! ;) Jumping cheese Cont@ct 05:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! edit
Dear Dave,
Thank you so much for your kind and beautiful words - you made me blush! :) It's a great pleasure to meet a great person and dedicated Wikipedian like you. I've also seen you around, and it's a delight to watch your zeal in dealing with vandalism, combined with your kind approach to your peers. I don't have to tell you, you'll always be welcome at my Talk page, no matter if you need my help, or if you simply feel like talking and sharing a virtual cup of coffee with me - and next time, I'll bring the cookies! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 21:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
BCE
I find BCE offensive. If the article's about Buddhism then feel free to use the Buddhist calendar (if there is one). If using the Christian calendar, please acknowledge that it is just that. Anyway, there's no AD, it's just BC, and not many people deny that Christ did exist. Thanks.
Thanks for bringing this page to my attention. I have added a proposal for deletion to the article. If it is contested the I will open an article for deletion debate for it. Regards LittleOldMe 21:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the correction. I will leave a note for the user in question. Regards LittleOldMe 21:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
you didn't fix it yet.
Thanks for your recent edits on wikipedia. They have really contributed to the wiki community. Your patrolling on Vandalism has helped against the people who deface this fantastic encyclopedia Thanks Hageba 04:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Editor's Review Thanks edit
Thank you for your participation in providing me with a critique in my recent editor's review, archived here. I read and take each person's comments very seriously, whether or not the content is critical or praiseworthy. I look forward to working with you in future Wikipedia projects.
-- Real96
Reverting vandalism on my talk page edit
Thank you! Zucchini Marie → Complain here Please sign! 00:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you! edit
I'm so sorry it took me a day to get back to you, dear David, but I didn't want to leave your beautiful and kind words unreplied. I don't know what to say... other than I realy aprreciate your thoughts - I'm kinda unused to receive such beautiful compliments over my small sillinesses ;) While we're at this, check this warning template I made the other day, using a poem that Herostratus once wrote... I've used it a few times, but it never fails to shock vandals! ;) Anyway, love to see you around doing the awesome work you do. In a not very distant future, you should apply for RfA - when that day comes, I'll be there to help you, count on it. Have a wonderful day! :) Love, Phaedriel - 02:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Um.... edit
Why did you revert my edit in Toga removing trolling, only to revert it back? --ChrisP2K5 04:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Leaving us...? edit
David, have you left us, dear? :( You're really, sorely missed over here... do come back! We wait for you! Love, Phaedriel - 06:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
rollback edit
It looks like you may find rollback to be a useful tool, so I gave it to you. This is the full spiel. If you don't want it, just let me know. Cheers, NoSeptember 05:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Photo Reuse edit
Hi! I would like to get in touch with you regarding reuse of a photo you've posted. Thanks! --SpaceInitatives (talk) 18:45, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Seeking clarification edit
Hello. You added a photograph of a Chinese restaurant to the Chop Suey article with the caption stating that, "Restaurants like this are now rare, but were once a common sight in the United States." It is unclear what this means, specifically "restaurants like this." Restaurants like what, exactly? I do not understand from looking at the photograph how this restaurant can be distinguished from any other Chinese restaurant because the picture is not sufficiently self explanatory. Any help with rewriting the caption would be appreciated. Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 11:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Would you help to review a Japanese translation made by Wikipedians? edit
There's been a recent discussion at the talk page of the article for the Internet meme All your base are belong to us. The topic was made famous for the gruesome Engrish translations in the original video game, and the article provided a somewhat more accurate translation along the original text.
The discussion could benefit from a review of the accuracy of these translations as it appeared in this recent version, by someone with fluency in Japanese and experience dealing with editor-made translations at Wikipedia. Thanks for your time. Diego (talk) 11:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Timeline of Sun Myung Moon edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, Timeline of Sun Myung Moon, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2013 (UTC) Steve Dufour (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation edit
Your upload of File:Coffeeguy.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Everyguy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Scanstartnew.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused, unclear use/purpose
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Scanendnew.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned graph/chart/diagram.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Scanmidnew.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned graph/chart/diagram.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)