EstricPolearm
| This user is a student editor in Yavapai_College/HUM_202_-_Introduction_to_Mythology_(Fall_2022) . |
Welcome!
editHello, EstricPolearm, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Peer review
editLEAD: the lead has a good introduction sentence; however, it does not have a brief description of the article so that could be added in even if it's just a sentence or two describing what the article contains. The lead could use some more details as well its very basic.
CONTENT: as far as the content goes, I think they are doing a good job it could use more details as its very basic. (I know its incomplete so I am sure more will be added) the writing is good it leads me to want to read more and get more information on the subjects, so I think if you go into further details of the "how" and the "why" it would really give the reader what they are looking for.
TONE AND BALANCE: I have no critique for this one because they did an excellent job staying neutral.
SOURCES AND REFERENCES: the sources and references appear to be good they used a wide range of sources. A good idea would be to pull as much information from the sources as possible.
ORGANIZATION: So far, the article seems well organized, I didn't notice any grammar or spelling errors, The writing is clear, separated into sections of major points of the article.
IMAGES AND MEDIA: no images have been added to the article yet.
FOR NEW ARTICLES: I am unsure if this is a new article, and I don't know how to tell the difference, but they appear to me to be following/have all the guidelines this suggests.
OVERALL IMPRESSIONS: overall I think this article has a strong start, it is well written so far. like I mentioned it could use more details but I'm sure they will add them as its incomplete. I think they are doing a great job so far and I enjoy what i read so far it made me want to learn more so that's fantastic.
User:EstricPolearm/Unkulunkulu/LunaRavenrose Peer Review - Wikipedia