Welcome!

Hello, EstherLois, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- roundhouse0 (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

CFD edit

You might not have noticed this cfd. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks for the notice!EstherLois (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

  It is important that you provide edit summaries, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Abraham Lincoln assassination‎. Edits without edit summaries are subject to being reverted or deleted. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category:Moravians (ethnic group) edit

Hi, you created the above category, but as far as I can see, no single person currently in it is/was really and undoubtedly Moravian by ethnicity. (In fact it is hard to tell what is the Moravian ethnicity and who belongs there.) Now there are even Jews and Germans in it. Please can you correct it or let it delete?--Ioannes Pragensis (talk) 15:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:GER/MZ edit

Be wellcome to the project...--Symposiarch (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wade edit

Nice work. I noticed that Wade is listed under the letter B instead of the letter W on the American Pentecostals. I would change it but I don't know how to edit that page.

(religiouseditor2008 (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC))Reply

CfDs edit

You may wish to know about the following:

HeartofaDog (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

(Category:Saint Michael's Abbey, Farnborough added to the nom for Reading Abbey.HeartofaDog (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC))Reply

CfD edit

As you have done a lot of work in creating new burial categories you might like to consider:

Regards, Ephebi (talk) 18:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

New articles need to be verifiable by other editors, and have therefore to be sourced - please see WP:V. HeartofaDog (talk) 23:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Burial places of Popes edit

 

Category:Burial places of Popes, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Category:Burials at cemeteries edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Burials at cemeteries, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Burials at cemeteries was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Burials at cemeteries, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Cremations edit

 

Category:Cremations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:American Assemblies of God people edit

 

Category:American Assemblies of God people, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Overseas Panamanians edit

 

Category:Overseas Panamanians, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:20th century Christian religious leaders edit

I have nominated Category:20th century Christian religious leaders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jeffro77 (talk) 14:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:21st century Christian religious leaders edit

I have nominated Category:21st century Christian religious leaders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jeffro77 (talk) 14:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Christian religious leaders by century edit

I have nominated Category:Christian religious leaders by century (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jeffro77 (talk) 14:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:17th century Christian religious leaders edit

I have nominated Category:17th century Christian religious leaders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jeffro77 (talk) 14:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Creation edit

It is somewhat provocative to carry on creating categories while sibling ones are at cfd. Occuli (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've expressed no opinion on these categories, but I do have to agree that you would be better served by putting a serious effort into explaining and defending your rationale for them in the CFDs, rather than simply ignoring those discussions. Cgingold (talk) 12:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Religious leaders by century edit

I have nominated Category:Religious leaders by century (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 01:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

##th century Christians edit

I see that you created many useful but empty categories such as.

  • 17th century Anglicans (1)
  • 17th century Congregationalists (1)
  • 17th century Christian religious leaders (2)
  • 17th century Lutherans (1)
  • 17th century Roman Catholics (1)
  • and many others...

Many of these are categories I have been planning to creat for a while now but--- I am wainting until I have the names to fill them with. A name list is here (to be sorted) and A friend of mine will do a lot of sorting a filling by bot. You can still help but please not create a category you cannot fill right away. It is much easier to fend off CfD before they ever start, rather than after, and if the one you create are removed it can make people prone to want to remove others like it latter. Maybe not-- but it is again easier to prevent a CfD than to fight one after it starts. Thanks. --Carlaude (talk) 02:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:18th century Congregationalists edit

I have nominated Category:18th century Congregationalists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 02:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Christians by century edit

I have nominated Category:Christians by century (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 02:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

empty categories edit

As someone who likes your intent with categories, but not your timing, would you please stop creating any empty categories. I have plans to create such categories, but not until I can fill them by bot. See also User:Carlaude/Sandbox#List_C. --Carlaude (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Congregationalist clergy by period edit

I have nominated Category:Congregationalist clergy by period (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Religious leaders by period edit

I have nominated Category:Religious leaders by period (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 02:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Congregationalist clergy by nationality edit

I have nominated Category:Congregationalist clergy by nationality (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 03:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

categories edit

Please do not use a name like Category:XXX by period when Category:XXX by century fits the category and is much more clear. It is also prefered since it promotes a flater category-tree. Thanks. --Carlaude (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Thank you. I will when it is most appropriate. However, when there is more involved than just centuries, it seems the "period" category is more helpful. But thanks for the tip. EstherLois (talk) 21:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Cool. I notice you seemed to have not to even voted to keep the categories you have created. CDF:Category:Christians by century for example, I hope to will stay. Please consider doing so.--Carlaude (talk) 20:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Categories (again) edit

What IS it with you and categories? As you must know pefectly well by now there is NO POINT creating hundreds of categories with nothing in them. Please give it a rest: why don't you write some more articles on Non-Conformist American bishops instead? HeartofaDog (talk) 22:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello, EstherLois. I was very pleased to see that you took my advice last week and began to participate in the CFD discussions. But I've just discovered that you're continuing to churn out large numbers of categories of doubtful utility. We are all expected to learn from our mistakes as editors -- but so far there does not seem to be a whole lot of evidence that you are learning from yours. So I really want to implore you to give some serious consideration to the many hours of work that you're forcing your fellow editors to expend on cleaning up these messes that you have created, however well intended. For your own good, I hope you will take this appeal to heart, because if you continue on the same course you will run the risk of being blocked for what is known as "WP:Disruptive editing". So please give us some indication that you are taking these concerns seriously. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 19:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Moravians (ethnic group) edit

 

Category:Moravians (ethnic group), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 12:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

You've been mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents edit

Hello EstherLois. Your edits are being discussed at WP:ANI#User:EstherLois. You are invited to respond there. EdJohnston (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sock of Pastorwayne edit

Block by User:Georgewilliamherbert. EdJohnston (talk) 23:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Hare Krishna religious leaders edit

I have nominated Category:Hare Krishna religious leaders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wikidas© 00:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Burials at missions edit

 

Category:Burials at missions, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. TheGrappler (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:American Quaker clergy edit

 

Category:American Quaker clergy, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Purplebackpack89 05:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Quaker clergy by nationality edit

 

Category:Quaker clergy by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Purplebackpack89 15:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lutheran linguists edit

Category:Lutheran linguists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Burials in catacombs edit

 

Category:Burials in catacombs, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Burial place unknown edit

 

Category:Burial place unknown, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Burials at priories edit

Category:Burials at priories, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 20:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Burials by city edit

Category:Burials by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 21:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Clergy in the American Civil War has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Clergy in the American Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Clergy in World War I has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Clergy in World War I, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Clergy in World War II has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Clergy in World War II, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 23:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Seventh-day Adventist clergy by nationality has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Seventh-day Adventist clergy by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AmericanAir88(talk) 23:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:American Seventh-day Adventist clergy has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:American Seventh-day Adventist clergy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean Roman Catholic priests edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean Roman Catholic priests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cape Verdean priests edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Cape Verdean priests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Roman Catholic archbishops indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Roman Catholic bishops indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 13:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ayyavazhi leaders has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Ayyavazhi leaders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Presiding bishops of the International Circle of Faith has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Presiding bishops of the International Circle of Faith has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 09:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Chamorro people by occupation has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Chamorro people by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply