User talk:Essam Sharaf/Archive 1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Essam Sharaf in topic Copyright problem: Amr Hamzawy

Speedy deletion of Hyperacidity edit

 

A tag has been placed on Hyperacidity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. (EhJJ)TALK 01:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

RE:Upper Limb Mind Map edit

Thank you so much for notifying me and its corrected now Maen. K. A. (talk) 21:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photo request edit

Is Cairo Airport convenient to your location? Would you mind photographing the Egyptair Administrative Complex on Airport Road to post on Wikipedia? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 13:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! edit

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter edit

 

We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to   The Bushranger (submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by   Hurricanehink (submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to   Yellow Evan (submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1,   Miyagawa (submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and   Jarry1250 (submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Ismail El Shafei edit

  Hello! Your submission of Ismail El Shafei at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

List of Presidents of Egypt edit

Hello, I like your changes over there and have restored and modified them a bit. Unfortunately, another gives on reverting to his version. Please chime in on this too. Deposuit (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter edit

 

So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to   The Bushranger (submissions) (first, with 487 points) and   Hurricanehink (submissions) (second, with 459), who stormed the first round.   Casliber (submissions) finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to   Jarry1250 (submissions) for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to   Stone (submissions) for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Amr Hamzawy edit

 

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amr Hamzawy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://fora.tv/speaker/11057/Amr_Hamzawy.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem: Amr Hamzawy edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Amr Hamzawy, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.carnegieendowment.org/experts/index.cfm?fa=expert_view&expert_id=237&prog=zgp&proj=zdrl,zme, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Amr Hamzawy saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


When articles are blanked for copyright violations, you have the option of writing a new version in the temporary page, but you do not have the option of removing the template yourself. As it notes, it is to be removed only by OTRS agents or administrators; it is considered a form of vandalism to remove the template and restore copyrighted text to publication. While I appreciate that you no doubt intended to address the copyright problem in doing so, I'm afraid that you cannot address a copyright problem by minimally altering text. What you do there is create a "derivative work", which we cannot use without license from the original. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

...research director and senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut part of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Mainly, his research interests include the changing dynamics of political participation in the Arab world and the role of Islamist movements in Arab politics.

The source says:

Amr Hamzawy is research director and senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut. His research interests include the changing dynamics of political participation in the Arab world and the role of Islamist movements in Arab politics....

There were other passages that similarly continued to follow too closely. These have been removed. Please see Wikipedia:Copy-paste for more information on how to use previously published sources in crafting articles under Wikipedia's copyright policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Sorry Moonriddengirl for my mistake deleting the template. As for the close paraphrasing, I can't change his work title which is "research director and senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut part of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace." it may seem like a long sentence but it is just his occupational title. As for others, I will do my best correcting those. Thanks Essam Sharaf (talk) 19:43, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for making the cabinets in Egypt collapsible. I wanted to keep them on the same page for easy comparison if someone wanted to do so, but I hadn't thought about collapsing them for general readability. Thanks - it looks much better. Flatterworld (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply