Wing Chun

edit

Perhaps a better wing chun table is warranted. I dont know, i suppose too much depth could get really complicated and alot of actual practitioners would argue about who practises real wing chun and who doesnt. However, the current list is sorely lacking.--Grisha H 17:43, 7 July 2006

I made if for Ngo Si Quy which is why there isn't much detail but its just a word file flow chart. If you want to make it more detailed I can send you the word doc and you can get as detailed as need be then take a screenshot and then upload the image.--Esemono 03:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I made a corrected version of the wing chun lineage diagram you produced. There are several important connections which were either missing or inaccurate. I've stayed away from anything provocative or disputed (like the existence of Leung Bik, for example), and only corrected information which is uncontroversial and is the common description given by those lineages. Please take a look :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VinhXuanLineage_corrected_1.1.jpg JeffieFreedom (talk) 21:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re: Ha! Ha! Guy

edit

Yep, I won the auction. The box is currently mounted to the wall of my cubicle at work. I do not have a digital camera, but I will probably be getting one for Christmas... in the meantime, I could probably use a scanner to scan in a picture of it. Better than nothing! Doc Sigma (wait, what?) 14:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

re animations

edit

I agree, they aren't animating when thumbnailed. Weird. If this hasn't been brought up with tech, it needs to be. --Golbez (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The tech village pump, or the technical channel on IRC. I apologize for not getting off my ass and doing it myself, I'll go mention it now. --Golbez (talk) 18:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Duh, I should have checked it right away. It's been brought up here. --Golbez (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, but something went wrong, and it stopped making thumbnails for all animations. --Golbez (talk) 17:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just thought you might get a kick out of this...

edit

I am currently undergoing a project to write articles on all of the Governors of American Samoa who are not covered on the project. I just thought I might point something funny out to you. You created an article called Thomas C. Latimore back in 2006; while his disappearance makes him notable in its own right, most of the sources on him completely miss the fact that he was a Governor of American Samoa as well, albeit briefly. Since you are obviously interested in the man, I figured this fact may intrigue you (it's in the article now). Cheers! Scapler (talk) 03:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

GIFs

edit

WP:VPT, though I think I saw a thread there already. --Golbez (talk) 13:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Emilio Changco

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Shibuya incident

edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rescue of Dustoff 65

edit

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Gaetano Faillace

edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Oliver F. Atkins

edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for David Wong (writer)

edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for List of people who died climbing Mount Everest

edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

FP NOM

edit

[1] TCO (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

They just want you to add the references to the file copy of the picture.

edit

See how the map for Painted turtle was done. [2]

Sorry, if it feels like you are being criticized.

I just liked the map and wanted it honored.

TCO (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oakville, Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

European Sexuality leading up to and during World War II

edit

This article was prodded, I de-prodded it because it's certainly sourced well, but I'd suggest you address the concerns about that on the article's talk page, and if you have a chance, work on expanding it a bit more with additional sources. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 01:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter and Murray Corren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abbotsford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit war over unnamed sniper(s)

edit

Please discuss disagreements here on the talk page of the article rather than edit warring on the main page. Thank you - Galloglass 10:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Chris Masters

edit

If you really want to get verification for Australian snipers kills why not write to Mr Masters asking him to substantiate his claim? I am a journalist covering defence matters, perhaps his agent would allow me to pass on his e-mail for you? Once you receive verification and it is in print you can then cite it. Your problem is that The Australian Telegraph will not verify Mr Masters claim, they have not published a story detailing the shots and refuse to verify. From what I understand the forthcoming book is no different, just a vague claim about a shot 400m longer than any other in recorded history. When Craig Harrison beat the world record he did it by 40m and that was only due to the ambient density of the valley floor, for someone to claim that two unknown snipers not only beat that shot but beat it by FOUR HUNDRED metres is unbelievable to say the least. The Barrett's M82 and M107 have a sub MOA to 600 yards and a MOA of 2.0 to 1800 yards, do you see my point? Best wishes. Twobells (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

St. Joseph Catholic Church (San Antonio, Texas)

edit

Thank you so much for bringing needed attention to the St. Joseph article. Your contributions have brought real improvement.- Gilliam (talk) 12:41, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Pyotr Verzilov

edit

I see neither you nor Parsecboy involved in the review of this article. Do you have another account? If so, you should make this available to others. I don't think you can review for other people anyway...but just so you know. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 23:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rudeness

edit

Was this level of rudeness really necessary? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 23:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Esemono. I noticed that you jumped in and wrote a new hook and approved it. Please see Rule H2. If you write a hook, you have to wait for another reviewer to approve it. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh I thought you suggested the hook when you said "What about working something around her 70-year acting career? Or even better, the paltry number of people at her funeral?" I just made it purdy. -- Esemono (talk) 14:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
You're right, I did suggest it ... but I didn't write it myself, or else I couldn't approve it. Thanks for writing it so nicely! Yoninah (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Operation Fish

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Operation Fish at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Everett Hughes (general)

edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Merrill Mueller

edit

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:33, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cheers

edit

Thanks Esemono for the reviewing my nomination, i was beginning to think that the 'flying lamas' would be left languishing in limbo. i also appreciate the edits you made on In Secret Tibet, it looks a lot tidier now, and i'll be using that smart Harvard ref thing in the future. Hillbillyholiday talk 17:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Operation Fish

edit

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Large Animations don't work

edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_110#The_animation_of_thumbnails_gifs

https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47409

Orphaned non-free media (File:Blaz kraljevic.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Blaz kraljevic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1998 Eskridge car accident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macmillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Leroy Barnes/Archive1 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leroy Barnes/Archive1. Since you had some involvement with the Leroy Barnes/Archive1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). BDD (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

ISBN

edit

Hi Esemono. I realise you probably have forgotten, as it was quite a while ago, but with this edit you entered a completely malformed ISBN as a reference; you don't happen to know what the ISBN actually is, do you? Cheers, LindsayHello 05:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Carlos-Smith.jpg

edit

A file you have been previously involved with is under discussion at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:Carlos-Smith.jpg Trackinfo (talk) 07:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Balkans Animation

edit
 
 
The Dobruja.

Hello!

Very good job on the Balkan animation map! However, I'd like to suggest a few minor corrections:

  • 1796: The Venetian Republic, besides parts of Dalmatia and the Ionian Islands, owns 4 cities on the Greek mainland: Butrinto, Parga, Preveza and Vonitsa/Vonizza. These should (could) be green on your map.
  • 1797: Napoleon and Austria basically share the Venetian Republic. Dalmatia and the Venetian Province go to Austria (should be red on the map) while the Ionian islands and the aforementioned 4 cities are annexed by the French Republic (should be blue). Besides, the Cisalpine Republic is formed, and the northern part of the Papal States should be light green from then on, as this is very much the same State as the Italian Republic (1802-1805) and the Kingdom of Italy (1805–1814).
  • 1799: the French Ionian islands are lost to a Russian-Turkish fleet. The map correctly references the creation of the Septinsular Republic in 1800, but it should include the city of Parga until 1819, while the cities of Butrinto, Preveza and Vonitsa become Ottoman.
  • 1805: the Austrian Venetian Province and Dalmatia are lost to the Kingdom of Italy, while the continental part of the Kingdom of Sicily in conquered by France, which placed a French king at its head but does not annex it.
  • 1809: following a new Austrian defeat, the Illyrian Provinces, a French imperial territory, are formed out of territory taken from Austria (part of today's Slovenia and Croatia) and the Kingdom of Italy (Dalmatia). Its borders are correct in the map, but not its creation date (1800, should be 1809).
  • 1815-1859: The northern part of the Papal States (the Papal Legations) are returned to the Holy See, while they are red (Austrian) on the current map during this period.
  • The Dobruja border between Romania and Bulgaria is not correct. It is set in 1878 at its present-day location (further South of the border shown on the map). It is moved South in 1913, with South Dobruja going to Romania until 1940, except a short period in 1918-1919 when Bulgaria controls a zone extending North of the current border (actually, it could be the limit shown on the map for the 1878-1913 period). It is correct after 1940.

I believe these are the changes worth mentioning in the map history, whereas some other changes are less historically significant or too quickly reverted:

  • In 1799, the Cisalpine Republic is occupied by Austrian-Russian forces, before a French reconquest in 1800. Short-lived Roman Republic (1799) and Parthenopean Republic appear in Southern Italy.
  • In 1801, the Cisalpine-Austrian border is slightly changed at the Treaty of Lunéville, moving from a line along the Mincio river to the Adige
  • In 1808, the Kingdom of Italy is augmented to the South, annexing present-day Marche while the remainder of the Papal States become French departments.

Do you think it is possible (and worthwhile) to make these amends? Dodecanese and Crete also changed hands a few times during the period, but as the map does not currently cover them, we should leave them out of it. Place Clichy (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Afghan diaspora

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles de Gaulle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Embankment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:ChairmanMaoPortrait.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChairmanMaoPortrait.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talk page archives

edit

Hello, thanks for creating talk page archives. However, after checking out your efforts at the talk page for Rafael Trujillo, I've discovered that you've been creating archives the wrong way for many years, as recently as April 2013. It's worth noting the following:

  • Archive names should contain a space before the number (i.e. "Archive 1" rather than "Archive1".
  • At the top of the archive page there should be a template such as {{talkarchive}}.
  • Instead of using a manually written-out archive box, you can use the code {{archivebox|auto=yes}} to automatically generate an archive box, assuming the pages' titles are formatted in the way I described above.

I've gone ahead and corrected these problems in all the archives that you've created over the years. Graham87 08:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Infobox military conflict timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 10:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:1979 U.S. embassy burning in Islamabad - Loyd Miller.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geogene (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello

edit

We've never met before and I just found you very recently, but I just wanted to drop by and say thanks for your past contributions because they've been a big help. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bertrand Stewart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Marne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re: DYK copyvio

edit

That actually looks like a site that copied from us, not the other way around. ViperSnake151  Talk  02:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bertrand Stewart

edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bernard Frederick Trench

edit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Esemono, your DYK review here was incomplete. Please return to finish the review, or if you don't plan to return, please let us know so a new reviewer can be found to complete it. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion for Ümit Yaşar Toprak

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ümit Yaşar Toprak , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. David O. Johnson (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:NataliaBessmertnova.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:NataliaBessmertnova.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

List of computer criminals

edit

I've just found this list, featured over five years ago, and noticed some inconsistencies in formatting that clearly indicate newer entries. Indeed, several appear to have been added since 2009, and although I've made efforts to better integrate them into the list, I'm not sure all of them are really notable. (It doesn't help that many of the source links, original and other, are now broken.) Perhaps the list's talk page would be a better place for this, but considering that you took the list to FL and gave assurances there about the ability to maintain standards of notability, I thought you might be better qualified than most to tell what ought to stay in and what needs to get out. Waltham, The Duke of 20:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Minerva Armored Car

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Minerva Armored Car at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

German hospital ship Ophelia

edit

Hi Esemono,

I noticed that you have twice reverted my removal of the hatnote at German hospital ship Ophelia, the second time with the edit summary "SS Ophelia is on the Ophelia disambiguation page". The guideline I linked to in my edit is the guideline about disambiguating article names that are not ambiguous, which states that such disambiguation is not appropriate. It is the majority case that the article in question exists on the disambiguation page in question; such is therefore not a reason to make an exception in this case. After reading the relevant guideline, do you see a reason to make an exception?

Neelix (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Georges Weill

edit

Harrias talk 12:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Precious

edit

"and so it was born"
Thank you, veteran editor, for creating quality articles on people in history such as Heraclius, Georges Weill and Francis Pegahmagabow, starting with a list of helicopter prison escapes, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1088 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Two years! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Coast Artillery articles

edit

I noticed that you wrote 16-inch gun M1895. I'm working on US Coast Artillery gun articles myself. I expanded 8-inch M1888 to include the disappearing version of the gun, and I worked on 16"/50 caliber M1919 gun and 16"/50 caliber Mark 2 gun. I'm planning to expand 12-inch Gun M1895 to include the other types of Coast Artillery 12" guns, and to make a new article about the 10" guns. Does this conflict with anything you're planning to do? RobDuch (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:The Renegades TV Show 1982.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:The Renegades TV Show 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Hughes Bolckow

edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 16-inch gun M1895

edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMHS Asturias

edit

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit

  Hello! Your submission of HMS Niger (1892) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of HMS Bayano (1913)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of HMS Bayano (1913) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMS Bayano (1913)

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Why did you revert my change? What do you need those refnames for? HandsomeFella (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
The future. If I add more info from the sources or add another cite it is better and easier to have the refs named, good programming. -- Esemono (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Placing your answer here. I placed your page on my watchlist when I added my post. (But now I'm removing it again.) HandsomeFella (talk) 14:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMS Niger (1892)

edit

Harrias talk 12:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Robert Grant Haliburton

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for French corvette Alecton

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Fukushi Masaichi

edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Ghost boat at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 07:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Carlos Franqui.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Carlos Franqui.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reverted your deletion of content from Talk:Longest recorded sniper kills

edit

Please do not remove discussions from article talk pages, particularly when other editors contributions are also deleted. Talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony Loyd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HVO. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Bone (disambiguation)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Robert Bone (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brycehughes (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Esemono. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK for HMS Negro (1916)

edit

On 16 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HMS Negro (1916), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that following a collision, HMS Negro sank after two depth charges from HMS Hoste tore open its hull? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Negro (1916). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, HMS Negro (1916)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

SoWhy 12:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Peters Band

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Peters Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HapHaxion (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hans Larwin

edit

Are you able to provide a reference for the awards that Hans Larwin received? That section is currently unreferenced and a reference is needed before this goes ahead at DYK. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Hans Larwin

edit

On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hans Larwin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hans Larwin painted Soldat und Tod in 1917 when he was the official war painter for the Austria-Hungary dual monarchy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hans Larwin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hans Larwin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Let L 610.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Let L 610.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Acrassicauda 2009 Album - Only the dead see the end of war.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Acrassicauda 2009 Album - Only the dead see the end of war.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Khufiyya

edit

Esemono, you passed this for DYK, but I see at least two paragraphs that don't have a closing reference, and there's a few other issues--copy edits for grammar, unclarities. It's on the front page right now; maybe you and 損齋 can help with further improvements. Drmies (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for List of most lethal American battles

edit

On 2 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of most lethal American battles, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that three of the most lethal battles involving the United States military saw more than 20,000 soldiers killed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of most lethal American battles. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, List of most lethal American battles), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Esemono. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BrunoStojic.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:BrunoStojic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Deadliest single days of World War I

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Deadliest single days of World War I at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:35, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply