ErrgoProxy

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Unaccredited Higher Education Institutions in Switzerland has been accepted

List of Unaccredited Higher Education Institutions in Switzerland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you and i will do my best :)

From what i gathered their is a lot of work on the articels that tie to this one, a lot of dead links and some information need to be updated.

..again thank you ErrgoProxy (talk) 08:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Swiss Management Center

Hi ErrgoProxy. I see that you have proposed the deletion of Swiss Management Center. Unfortunately, the article is not eligible for proposed deletion because it was twice sent to articles for deletion (AfD) in the past. (See debate number 1 and debate number 2). I have therefore undone your proposed deletion.

What you can do is nominate the article for a third time at AfD, although you will have to convince other editors that something has changed since the last debate. If you choose this option, the steps you need to take are explained here. If you have any questions, do let me know. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the information. Yes i've read the reports from back in 2009 and 2010 and the person who filled them was actually right. I will submit my debate. ErrgoProxy (talk) 06:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. PierreLsn (talk) 00:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing / WP:OR

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at List of unaccredited higher education institutions in Switzerland, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PierreLsn (talk • contribs) 00:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry you made edites to the page and removing Government sources (international organizatons) from the said page and now reported me and accusing me of such unregistered links? what is this? You are saying SBFI is not a valid surce and UGW laws inside Switzerland that prohibit specific things. But then you ignore and misunderstood our entire comunication in the talk page and threathen me with block? for what reason you are doing this i do not know. You removed 10 links from Government pages,pdf files that explained everything in details

When i confronted you on why you did this you said it does not apply for hotelier schools, while the whole page covering before your edits private business schools in switzerland.

These files where holding insight on laws for higher education /scholarship /visa in Switzerland and protection of titles and degrees according the Federal law and Canton laws before you editing them out and trying to lock me out of my page. Mind you you have still not provided any source for your claims' and went on a rampage to remove all the evidence from the page.

Fact checking this to any senior editor for review on just what the hell is going on with your edits. ErrgoProxy (talk) 11:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Input requested at List of unaccredited higher education institutions in Switzerland. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, ErrgoProxy, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Equyl (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Actually the said account was used by me but i lost access to it since then so i made a new account. Thoe i am quite surprised how a user knew some of the information that was discussed by me on Equyl/SunDawn and provided by PierreLsn which was on private chat logs, for which i can only conclude the said report came from a person doing probably the very same thing they accused me of. I think your IT department can also atest to the simple fact that the said account Equyl has not been logged back or used, but given the abusive nature of the account in question they wanted to escalate things, which i am trying to shine some light on it.

Also i would use this opportunity to ask you an advice on who to contact from senior administration. If possible on private wikipedia chat log's or message cause the matter in question is of serious nature. Thank you in advance. ErrgoProxy (talk) 12:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

There really isn't any "IT department" or "senior administration"; this is a community run project. The standard way to raise issues which need administrative assistance is to post at WP:AN. If there's something of a confidential nature, you can mail it to any admin by going to their user page and clicking on the "Email this user" in the navigation box on the left margin of the page. For example, Special:EmailUser/RoySmith will send email to me. But if you do use that, keep in mind that I may not reply, and I can't promise I'll keep anything you send me confidential. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Unaccredited Higher Education Institutions in Switzerland

Hello, ErrgoProxy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unaccredited Higher Education Institutions in Switzerland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Unaccredited Higher Education Institutions in Switzerland

Hello, ErrgoProxy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Unaccredited Higher Education Institutions in Switzerland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

I haven't made any edits as you implied in your post, and I detest your assumption since it can be verified in the editing history of the page. Furthermore, I've observed that you also refrain from editing the page in question. The only concern from my end was on the Talk page that the news source Kotaku is compromised and of questionable quality since it promotes illegal actions, piracy, and has been banned by a number of industry veterans (Nintendo,Ubisoft, EA) due to leaked information in the past.

The editors on the page have questionable behavior and use editorialized writing for Wikipedia standards. The page in the end got dragged into the drama, that was somehow tried to be avoided. ErrgoProxy (talk) 09:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)