Hello Ernst, I have some comments on the content that is in your sandbox so far.
What does the article (or section) do well? - I think the tone of this article is very professional and unbiased. Wikipedia articles should serve to present information in a clear way and without showing the author's opinions. I think your article does this very well. I also really liked that you included research from universities and other reliable sources. You also provide very clear information about MEDIC and the progress that it has made.
What changes would you suggest overall? -I would add a little more background in the beginning to make a better transition into your addition. You start off with "another approach that has been investigated...", but I don't know what the previous approaches were and what the pros and cons of the other approaches are. I also don't know what these approaches relate to, so some more background would be good.
What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? -I think just adding a background for completeness would be helpful, and also adding other examples of technologies other than MEDIC, so that readers can gain a more holistic perspective.
Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! -I learned a lot from this article regarding tone that I want to bring to my own article. Also, like your article, I reference a lot of professional work and research and I lime how you cite your sources in the text and with a formal citation. This helps the reader understand the context of the research, as well as add credibility to your article.