Ericspant

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cincinnati weather forecast (February 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 07:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Ericspant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ericspant. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 03:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

March 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

That includes the Teahouse. David Biddulph (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Whenever you make changes to an article, it helps if you describe what you did in the Edit summary (at bottom of page). Also, adding a word or two or three that does not improve the intention of the article (programme, sport...) is not considered good editing. David notMD (talk) 03:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ericspant! Thank you for your contributions. I am Thegooduser and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:57, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Check your signature

It's setting off multiple filters every talk page you sign. AmioDarone (talk) 04:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Richard Gibson (footballer)

Hello, and thank you for trying to improve the article about Richard Gibson (footballer). However, I undid your changes the first time, and will do so again, because I didn't think they made the article better, and thought I should explain why.

Including the word "football" in the opening sentence, so that instead of

Gibson was an English professional footballer who played as a winger.

it reads

Gibson was an English professional footballer who played football as a winger.

makes the sentence repetitive without adding any information. And I'm afraid that sticking Then he died. onto the end of the paragraph just makes it read like a child's story rather than an entry in an encyclopedia.

I see you're aware of the Teahouse. If you don't understand what I'm trying to say here, I'm sure someone there will be able to help you. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

What were you thinking?

Is there a reason you restored slurs three times here [1] and gave extensive warnings to the accounts that correctly removed them? It’s time to start responding to questions about your edits. 208.105.50.34 (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. What were you thinking? Drmies (talk) 15:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@Drmies: 100% troll. Check out his two most recent (diff, diff) signatures. ——SerialNumber54129 15:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)