User talk:EricSerge/Archive 2

Latest comment: 10 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 07 May 2014
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Questia email failure: Will resend codes

Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Questia email success: Codes resent

Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi t | c 21:41, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

LTC Rascon

Thanks for assisting me in updating the content. I am looking at an existing references and OMG, there's more! Please take a look at my questions at MT:MILHIST#Identifying medals.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:42, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

NC-4 Medal

Nice job of editing...Well done...Thanks!--Nyctc7 (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I recently picked up the Emering book US Navy and Marine Corps campaign and commemorative medals. for $4 on Amazon and found the legislation authorizing the medal in Wikisource so I figured it was time for some addition and improvement. EricSerge (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Who is notable on the article Navy and Marine Corps Medal ‎

One of the names removed from this article yesterday Navy and Marine Corps Medal Frederick J Barbero, Chief Electrician, saved an entire submarine and its men from being lost. I have the citation, the newspaper reference and several other documents which prove this. Also the submarine has its own Wikipedia article with some of this history in it. Does that not make him notable? USS_S-35_(SS-140) Fifth Patrol.

That is an excellent question. Typically individuals included on a list of "notable recipients" need to be notable to Wikipedia standards. For information on this see WP:GNG. Basically, if they have an article they are notable. I do not know the details, but Chief Barbero may fall under WP:BIO1E. However, I would say that this action is probably worth including in the USS S-35 (SS-140) article. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. Mugginsx (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
I do not know how to contribute to a military-related article (unless it is medieval in nature!) but, if you know anyone interested in adding this information, I have his citation for bravery and other things I would be happy to send, even if it is just to do a personal assessment as to whether or not the information could be used in any way. Thanks. Mugginsx (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
I am up to my rear-end in alligators at the moment at work, but this evening I may be able to sit down and take a look. I will hit you up for sources if I cannot find any. EricSerge (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
That is extremely kind of you. Please take your time. I hope by alligators you mean you are in warm tropical weather.  It is quite cold here!
 
Hello, EricSerge. You have new messages at EricSerge's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I see your edit. Very, very kind of you. Mugginsx (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Distinguished Warfare Medal

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Academy Sports + Outdoors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harris County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Informing you of a PROD

Hi there, I saw that you were one of the users who contributed most to the Matthew Axelson article so I thought I would just let you know that it was PROD'd today by Beingsshepherd (talk · contribs) and it will be deleted after 5 March 2013 if left uncontested. Regards, — -dainomite   18:43, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Distinguished Warfare Medal

Hi! Just letting you know I passed it. Thanks for nominating! RetroLord 07:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't the nominator, but was glad to help out in the collaborative process. EricSerge (talk) 12:36, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

Article Feedback deployment

Hey EricSerge; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Autobiographer

Hi. That was a good and AGF message you left at User talk:Classic Skull. In case you wondered, the reason I left him a note about autobiography was that on another version of his article he wrote "i wrong spelled my own name.. i mean the upper case of my name.. example Tosan neavredith. i want Tosan Neavredith". Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

That is priceless. I suspected, based on the narrative style of writing, that it was an autobio or someone close to the subject. EricSerge (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Problem with GA nomination for Coast Guard Squadron One

Tag...you're it! Because of your interest in military and ships and things relating to such, as well as much editing on Coast Guard related articles I am asking for your assistance in getting the GAN to appear right on this articles talk page. This is the first article that I have substantially written that I have subbmitted for a GA review. I think the article is ready, but can't get the GA template to post right. If you or someone else could look into it, I will see where the chips fall as far as a GA review goes. Thanks Cuprum17 (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Looks like BlueMoonset got it working. I will give it a look after work tonight and keep my eyes open during the review. EricSerge (talk) 16:29, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Cuprum17 (talk) 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

Unlinked list entry

Hi, I couldn't see why you unlinked this entry, so I re-linked it. Otherwise I was about to tag the line as uncited. I can't see any reason not to include redirects in a list of names on Wikipedia:WikiProject Anthroponymy pages. – Fayenatic London 12:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

His page was redirected per, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamar Joseph Conner. Why I unlinked it I cannot remember, but if I were to do it again today, I would just remove it from the list. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Ah, I see, from the end of this list. Well done – I wish more people would bother with removing backlinks after AfD. I also agree with removing the entry from the list, and have now done so. – Fayenatic London 17:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

 
Hello, EricSerge. You have new messages at Srich32977's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

Welcome to MILHIST

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Ulster Defence Regiment Medal

I made the table of LS medals to default as 'collapsed'. The article just didn't look right when it defaulted open. Perhaps there were too many red (no links) within it?Gavin Lisburn (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

No worries. Help me knock out some of those red links by starting articles. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:25, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

June 2013 backlog reduction drive

  Military history service award
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your contributions to the WikiProject's June 2013 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject award. Anotherclown (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
Page is written very well. Ameya Narvekar 15:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the Wikilove. EricSerge (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for H.M. Coastguard Long Service and Good Conduct Medal

Orlady (talk) 08:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Nomination of Oggy (character) for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oggy (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oggy (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yann98 (talk) 11:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey EricSerge. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:00, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Insigne des blessés militaires.png)

  Thanks for uploading File:Insigne des blessés militaires.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 23:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah it appears it was replaced by a commons image back in June 2012. EricSerge (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gregg A. Sturdevant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meritorious Service Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Timothy Britten

The article Timothy Britten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-noteworthy police officer. Winning a medal of valor is not necessarily notability.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. -- Thargor Orlando (talk) 15:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Timothy Britten for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Britten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Britten until a consensus is Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

"Heads up"

Thanks for the "heads up" - I'll have a look at it tomorrow. Yes, I am interested - thanks for bringing it to my attention. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Added my 2 cents' worth. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Thank you sir. EricSerge (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin Rand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

Hi Eric Serge, if you check page B-1 of http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/icd/icd-655.pdf you'll see this literally replaced the National Intelligence Achievement Medal, which was not retired but was simply renamed in the 2012 ICD-655 memo. Thus, it might make sense to update the Wikipedia's title and say the National Intelligence Exceptional Achievement Medal was previously called the National Intelligence Achievement Medal however their rank, distinction, and everything else are one and in the same. Icd655 (talk) 04:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC) :The source you reference does not state that the NIAM and NIEAM are the same thing. In fact, the 2012 ICD-655 memo makes no reference to the NIAM. You are making a supposition that is not based on a reliable source. In reading DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTIVE 7/1 that doc states that the National Intelligence Achievement Medal ranks directly below the National Intelligence DSM, directly contradicting your assertion of identical rank. EricSerge (talk) 15:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Discussion continued here: Talk:National Intelligence Achievement Medal

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:19, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

 

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)

Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world.

Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations...

Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...

Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...

Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

Books & Bytes, Issue 4

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014

 

News for February from your Wikipedia Library.

Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers

Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement

American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia

Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th

Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias

Read the full newsletter


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

Books & Bytes - Issue 5

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 5, March 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

  • New Visiting Scholar positions
  • TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
  • Australian articles get a link to librarians
  • Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

Some baklava for you!

  Thanks, Serge. That was only my second edit and I did kinda botch it. Thanks for cleaning it up. How did you restore the deletions? OfficerMancuso (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

@OfficerMancuso: Thanks for the baklava! No worries about the edit. When you open the history tab in an article, there is a link to undo what you just did. The biggest thing is using the preview option before saving an edit, I have caught many mistakes that way. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 23:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

Your edit of Thad Allen

Eric, although Admiral Allen is pictured as not wearing the Coast Guard Presidential Unit Citation, is does not mean he wasn't awarded one. The link to ALCOAST 317/06 dated 091412Z JUN 06 states that all members of the Coast Guard whether active, reserve, auxiliary, or civilian were awarded the citation. Allen was on active duty at the time of Hurricane Katrina, therefore he his a awardee of the Coast Guard PUC according to paragraph 4 of the message...

4. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: ALL CG ACTIVE DUTY, RESERVE, AUXILIARY, AND CIVILIAN PERSONNEL WHO WERE AFFILIATED WITH THE COAST GUARD AT ANY TIME DURING THE PERIOD (29 AUGUST 2005 - 13 SEPTEMBER 2005) ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THE AWARD.

Please reconsider your edit. You may use the link as basis of a citation, if you wish. Cuprum17 (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

@Cuprum17:, I think I see it if I squint at the painting. I was basing the edit on pictures from his retirement ceremony in 2010, well after ALCOAST 317/06: File:Defense.gov photo essay 100525-N-0696M-092.jpg. ADM Papp wears it, but ADM Allen does not. EricSerge (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
sorry, I didn't know there was a discussion going on here about it. You're right, Allen's not wearing it there while Papp is (albeit in the wrong precedence place). Not sure what's going on, why wouldn't he be wearing it? He was in charge of the operation it was awarded for. hmm.... Odd. Gecko G (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
@Gecko G: Navy and Coast Guard seem to wear their ribbons backwards on the right side when wearing medals. I had never noticed this before. All ribbons are backwards as are devices. But, we digress.
Could it be because Allen was seconded to FEMA, initially as deputy and then as the Principal Federal Official for rescue and recovery operations? EricSerge (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
wow... looking again (at that picture and some other CG full dress pictures), you're right, they are "backwards" (relative to the Army & MC method). And you say the Navy's the same way?
good idea about the FEMA/Federal assignments, however, a) I don't think it works that way (though I'm not sure) & b) He would still be eligible for the period before Sept. 5th, right? I'm really not sure what is going on in that picture. Gecko G (talk) 23:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
@Gecko G: Here are pics of ADM Mullen in Full Dress Blue and Full Dress White uniforms with the same ribbon arrangement over the right side. I don't know that he is a good exemplar since he wears the RVN Gallantry Cross and Civil Actions medals, but when he wears ribbons they are the unit awards. EricSerge (talk) 00:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Perhaps he was seconded to FEMA, if he was then it was after the beginning date of eligibility. He continued to wear the uniform of a Coast Guard admiral during the time he was the Principal Federal Official. That being said, if he doesn't claim it or wear it, then who am I to say that it needs to be in the article. I will point out that Coast Guard Regulations state that if ribbons or medals are worn then there are three choices for wear at the wearers discretion; The top three in order of precedence, the top nine in order of precedence, or ALL of the medals authorized in order of precedence. I am sure that the admiral's aide, who would be responsible for his boss's uniform appearance would know this. As a side note, I wear all my ribbons that I am authorized from both Army and Coast Guard service including the Coast Guard PUC. I went on reserve orders September 10, 2005 just making the cut off. Cheers... Cuprum17 (talk) 23:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014