User talk:ErgoSum88/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

→

No content in Category:WikiProject Trivia and Popular Culture templates

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Trivia and Popular Culture templates, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:WikiProject Trivia and Popular Culture templates has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:WikiProject Trivia and Popular Culture templates, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Please unblock me!

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

IP block exemption granted.

Request handled by: J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Exemption removed as underlying block has been lifted. -- Avi (talk) 19:04, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Sweet

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Congrats on the TFA. In my lone experience, it's worth it. Yes, there is a @#$%load of vandalism to the article, but an army of people to help fight it. I only reverted like 3 times, and tried to 3 or 4 more but others beat me to it. There were a lot of constructive edits too, and the article was in better shape by the end of the day. That's great, a unique featured article. I'm guessing you didn't have many opposes at the nomination process.Dave (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Well thats good to know. I actually didn't nominate it for TFA, so I suppose it was automatic. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

You don't have to request an article for it to be the daily FA. Most of them aren't requested. Raul654 (talk) 01:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

That's even cooler. Yours got noticed by Raul, and placed on the main page out of sheer respect. I am in the presence of greatness, I kneel before you. =-) I had to get down on my knees and beg to get my first FA on the main page. =-) (And yes I had several oppose votes, but enough supports to get it through). Dave (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Hours of service