User talk:Enwebb/Archive 4

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Gerda Arendt in topic Horseshoe bat scheduled for TFA

19:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Poinsettia edit

The article Poinsettia you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Poinsettia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020 edit

 

Hello Enwebb,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Tessa Majors for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Tessa Majors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tessa Majors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Woolly Rhino edit

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgeparpas (talkcontribs) 16:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. Enwebb (talk) 19:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 22 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horseshoe bat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superfamily (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:59, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Horseshoe bat edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Horseshoe bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Need a story for the newsletter edit

ICYMI: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dinosaurs#A reflection on the Spinosaurus controversy, 5 and a half years later. Cheers --awkwafaba (📥) 02:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Awkwafaba, I'm not sure I'm following, what exactly is the controversy? Enwebb (talk) 16:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I think it's more of a lack of controversy. The palaontological community isn't really convinced of the quadrapedal, fully-aquatic version, but the public seems to accept it without much debate. just an idea. --awkwafaba (📥) 17:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter edit

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  •   Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
  •   Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
  •   Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
  •   Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
  •   CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
  • The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included   L293D,   Kingsif,   Enwebb,   Lee Vilenski and   CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup newsletter correction edit

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter;   L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead,   Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter edit

 
February 2020—Issue 011


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Segnosaurus by FunkMonk
  The Goldfinch (painting) by Jimfbleak
  Gharial by BhagyaMani, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Steller's sea ape by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Hog Farm
  Poinsettia by Enwebb, reviewed by Starsandwhales
  Honeynut squash by , reviewed by Ealdgyth

Newly nominated content

  Danuvius guggenmosi by Dunkleosteus77
  Denisovan by Dunkleosteus77
  Homo luzonensis by Dunkleosteus77
  Homo naledi by Dunkleosteus77
  Horseshoe bat by Enwebb
  Cimicidae by Cwmhiraeth and Chiswick Chap

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.


00:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Horseshoe bat edit

The article Horseshoe bat you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Horseshoe bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Shohei Otomo's usage of Pilot/Namiki pens 'in an advertisement' edit

I'm beginning revisions to the Ballpoint pen artwork wikipedia page and among my first edits I added a link to the wiki page about Shohei Otomo which I happened to come across by accident. Heads up: I'll also be making edits to link Otomo's wiki to related pages.

And... sorry BUT: I happen to know that the 'Pilot advertisement' you noted in his article is mistaken or at least misleading; the 'ad' was nothing more than a promotional video produced by Otomo or a collaborator (perhaps to gain Pilot's interest?), but the way it is written in the wiki makes it seem as if Pilot commissioned the video and it was used for advertising purposes. The video in question shows Otomo cracking open a beer before drawing, something I highly doubt such a respected Japanese institution as Namiki pens would allow to be depicted, even in the 21st century. That beer also happens to be identifiably a Kirin brand beer, something for which I doubt Pilot/Namiki & Kirin would be in cooperation. On top of that, the video shows no identifying credit at all, nothing to identify the video as an 'ad' and I can't think of any company who doesn't include a logo in an ad. If I remember correctly, only some kind of narration by Otomo himself, unrelated to the pens, runs through the so-called 'ad'. On top of that, Otomo's artwork basically subverts classic Japanese imagery and the artist himself openly criticizes Japan's consumerist culture, a trait which I highly doubt such a corporation would align itself with.

Unless it can be clearly proven otherwise, any text referring to Otomo's video as a Pilot/Namiki-commissioned ad is misleading and must therefore be reworded for accuracy and clarity. This is no slight to Otomo or his artwork; surely worthy of a wiki page but anything less than the facts should be relegated to the artist's own websites or social media. Penwatchdog (talk) 08:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you think the source or wording I used was wrong then feel free to remove per WP:BRD. Enwebb (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

17:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

21:17, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Peer review for FL proposition of List of horseshoe bats edit

  • Hello Enwebb, thanks for creating the List of horseshoe bats. I think that list has a potential to be a FL but it needs some review. I have some questions but could be more to correct before proposint the list to be a FL. Is it possible to make a peer review with the help of Bats TF? I will write some of my questions here:
  1. As I'm not a native speaker, I have some difficulty about the use of "in/on", especially for the islands. In the text, when I put the range for subspecies I used Csorba et al. as the reference, and there for all islands only "in" was used. I have corrected for some small islands by using "on" but for bigger islands "in" is used, e.g. for Borneo, it should be in or on?
  2. In the opening it is said there are 106 species, but I counted 103 species. There are still many different classifications. I don't know which one is valid. Handbook of the Mammals of the World - Volume 9 (2019) could be used as the reference for the species, but I don't have access. Is it possible to find somebody to help with it?
  3. Formosan lesser horseshoe bat (R. monoceros) redirects to Little Japanese horseshoe bat (R. cornutus) but it should have its own article.
  4. For synonyms, I have used again Csorba et al. But I have another question. When a taxon is considered a subspecies after its description as a species, we could consider it as a junior synonym or not?
  5. Also I think we need more header text before proposal.
Thanks in advance for your help. --Mskyrider (talk) 07:11, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Mskyrider, I'm not enwebb, but your question about in vs on for islands is intriguing. I'd say "on Corsica" but "in Sicily." I want to say "on Borneo." I am going to have to think about why. --valereee (talk) 19:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Mskyrider: I'll be a WikiJaguar too, and say that 'in' is for political areas, and 'on' if for physical islands. One is 'in' (the country of} Australia, and 'on' {the island of) Australia. So either really works. English can take it however you want to do it. --awkwafaba (📥) 00:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Mskyrider, agreed with awkwafaba about the use of on and in.
  • As for your 2nd point, I don't have access to that work either. My typical less than legal approach to obtaining books doesn't happen to have this title--probably because it's pretty new. All my local libraries are closed right now, but you can try posting on the resource request page. Conversely, I saw 4444hhhh adding a reference to Mammals of the World Vol. 9 on Bat, so maybe they can help you out
  • The bats task force has been mostly following mammaldiversity.org. They follow this 2008 publication (which is in Chinese) in listing R. monoceros as a subspecies of R. cornutus.
  • If I understand your question correctly for point 4, yes, a taxon that has been demoted from species to a subspecies is almost certainly going to have its name considered as a junior synonym, as long as that is consistent with the Principle of Priority
  • I've never reviewed a Featured List or helped make one, but I can contribute more here if that would be helpful to you! Enwebb (talk) 16:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

map edit

Hey, Enwebb! Did you make the map? There'd been one there a few days ago, but it became outdated so I pulled it, it's good to have it again. Do you know how to do one of those sliding-scale thingies so you can see the development over time? --valereee (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Valereee, yes, I made the map! I can commit to updating it every day after 2pm when the new numbers come out. Can you think of an example of an article that has what you're talking about with the sliding scale? I'm not sure I've seen that before. Enwebb (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hm...I feel like I've seen one on a wp page, but maybe it's been in some source. Things blur together in my memory. :D Let me see if I can find an example of what I mean. --valereee (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Okay, like this idea, although obviously this is way more sophisticated than I'm talking about: https://vac-lshtm.shinyapps.io/ncov_tracker/ --valereee (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Valereee, I'm not sure how to make that for Wikipedia, but I could make a GIF if that would be helpful. That's not too hard. Enwebb (talk) 01:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

condolences on the loss of your pet edit

17:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

17:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter edit

 
March 2020—Issue 012


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Argentinosaurus by Slate Weasel and Jens Lallensack
  Wolf by LittleJerry
  Horseshoe bat by Enwebb, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Cimicidae by Cwmhiraeth and Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Enwebb
  Coronariae by Michael Goodyear, reviewed by Dank
  Ardipithecus ramidus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by starsandwhales
  Ooedigera by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Hog Farm
  Bathyphysa conifera by Awkwafaba, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Calliphora vomitoria by Y.shiuan, reviewed by Jens Lallensack

Newly nominated content

  Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations by Britishfinance
  Bathyphysa conifera by Awkwafaba
  Moniliformidae by Mattximus
  Disease X by Britishfinance
  Mandarin Patinkin by Rhododendrites




  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Tree of Life newsletter distribution edit

Hello! Just in case you did not see my note here, I'm hoping you can share the newsletter with the relevant WikiProjects as well. Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Another Believer, Done! Thanks for the reminder. Enwebb (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Enwebb, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
Congratulations for one year on the news(letter) beat! Great job! Guettarda (talk) 22:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you :) Enwebb (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Hey Enwebb, thanks for your comments they were really nice. I'm trying to fully create this wikipedia page as a class assignment. I don't want to be rude but since this is going to be graded I'd really appreciate it if I could fill out this article in it's entirety, just trying to get that undergrad degree but I really do wanna stress how much I appreciate your comments. Mutchroom (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

15:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

18:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary edit

A year ago ...
 
bats
... you were recipient
no. 2193 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2020 May newsletter edit

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  •   Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
  •   Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
  •   The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
  •   Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
  •   Lee Vilenski with 869 points,   Hog Farm with 801,   Kingsif with 719,   SounderBruce with 710,   Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and   MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Cinnamon red bat edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cinnamon red bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 17:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

16:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter edit

 
April 2020—Issue 013


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Danuvius guggenmosi by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by J Milburn
  Neanderthal by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Homo luzonensis by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Lythronax by FunkMonk, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Ichthyovenator by PaleoGeekSquared, reviewed by FunkMonk
  Secretarybird by LittleJerry, Aa77zz and Casliber, reviewed by The Rambling Man
  James John Joicey by RLO1729, reviewed by The Rambling Man
  Homo naledi by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Vermilion flycatcher by CaptainEek, reviewed by HickoryOughtShirt?4
  Canada lynx by Sainsf, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Alice Gray by Rhododendrites, reviewed by The Rambling Man
  Caryodendron orinocense by CPC273, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Jaguarundi by Sainsf, reviewed by Usernameunique
  Gigantopithecus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Starsandwhales
  Denisovan by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Starsandwhales
  Disease X by Britishfinance, reviewed by DannyS712

Newly nominated content

  Lythronax by FunkMonk, Lythronaxargestes and IJReid
  Ichthyovenator by PaleoGeekSquared
  Neanderthal by Dunkleosteus77
  Alpine newt by Tylototriton
  Secretarybird by LittleJerry, Aa77zz and Casliber
  List of ursids by PresN
  Borchgrevinkium by Super Dromaeosaurus
  Caryodendron orinocense by CPC273
  Siamosaurus by PaleoGeekSquared
  Canada lynx by Sainsf
  Vietnam mouse-deer by Sainsf
  Jaguarundi by Sainsf
  Vermilion flycatcher by CaptainEek
  Alice Gray by Rhododendrites
  Gigantopithecus by Dunkleosteus77
  Paleobiota of the Posidonia Shale by Yewtharaptor
  Meerkat by Sainsf

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cinnamon red bat edit

The article Cinnamon red bat you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Cinnamon red bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

17:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

14:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

22:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

May 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter edit

 
May 2020—Issue 014


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Lythronax by FunkMonk, Lythronaxargestes and IJReid
  Meerkat by Sainsf, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Borchgrevinkium by Super Dromaeosaurus, reviewed by Amitchell125
  Nakalipithecus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Gog the Mild
  Scanisaurus by Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Gog the Mild
  Sand cat by BhagyaMani, reviewed by Aven13
  Pigs in culture by Chiswick Chap, reviewed by Sainsf
  Sun bear by Sainsf, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Megacephalosaurus by Macrophyseter, reviewed by Aven13
  Cinnamon red bat by Enwebb, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Banteng by Sainsf, reviewed by Chiswick Chap
  Cartorhynchus by Lythronaxargestes, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Black-footed cat by BhagyaMani, reviewed by Amitchell125
  Homo ergaster by Ichthyovenator, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Black coral by Aven13, reviewed by Sainsf
  Heuglin's gazelle by Sainsf, reviewed by The Rambling Man
  Australopithecus garhi by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Hog Farm
  Chororapithecus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by IJReid
  Ornithocheiromorpha by JurassicClassic767, reviewed by IJReid






Newly nominated content

  Gigantorhynchus by Mattximus
  Leech by LittleJerry, Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth
  List of mephitids by PesN
  Sand cat by BhagyaMani
  Cinnamon red bat by Enwebb
  Kristianstad Basin by Ichthyovenator
  Nakalipithecus by Dunkleosteus77
  Scanisaurus by Ichthyovenator
  Sun bear by Sainsf
  Heuglin's gazelle by Sainsf
  Black coral by Aven13
  Australopithecus garhi by Dunkleosteus77
  Chororapithecus by Dunkleosteus77
  Northern crested newt by Tylototriton
  Megacephalosaurus by Macrophyseter
  Banteng by Sainsf
  Cartorhynchus by Lythronaxargestes
  Ornithocheiromorpha by JurassicClassic767
  Black-footed cat by BhagyaMani
  Bat virome by Enwebb
  Echinodon by IJReid
  Homo ergaster by Ichthyovenator
  Dwarf dog-faced bat by Enwebb
  Doedicurus by Dunkleosteus77
  Zebra by LittleJerry

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Enwebb (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

21:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020 edit

 

Hello Enwebb,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

18:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

16:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote edit

Dear Enwebb,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Dwarf dog-faced bat edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dwarf dog-faced bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 20:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Special Barnstar
Thank you! Guettarda (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter edit

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  •   Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
  •   The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
  •   Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally,   MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Dwarf dog-faced bat edit

The article Dwarf dog-faced bat you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Dwarf dog-faced bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dunkleosteus77 -- Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 20:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bat virome edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bat virome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chidgk1 -- Chidgk1 (talk) 12:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bat virome edit

The article Bat virome you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bat virome for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chidgk1 -- Chidgk1 (talk) 06:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

16:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hammer-headed bat edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hammer-headed bat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Bat virome edit

The article Bat virome you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Bat virome for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chidgk1 -- Chidgk1 (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Merlin Tuttle edit

Hello! Thank you for informing me of my violation of Wikipedia's COI policy as I was previously unaware when making edits to Merlin Tuttle. I have publicly disclosed on my talk page my COI with the subject and I would like to move forward with properly contributing to Merlin's page if that is a possibility. I am new to Wikipedia and am a bit overwhelmed by the rules and complexities so my apologies for my ignorance! Please let me know if you would be interested in reviewing Merlin's page or what the appropriate procedure is for contributing to his page. Thank you! Dmil3422 (talk) 22:43, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for the clarification and glad to learn that you are a bat fan! About the photo, would it be possible to use it if I uploaded a signed consent form from Merlin and MTBC granting permission to use it?

Dmil3422 (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Hammer-headed bat edit

The article Hammer-headed bat you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Hammer-headed bat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

19:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck edit

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great flying fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fig.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

13:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

June/July 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter edit

 
June and July 2020—Issue 015


Tree of Life


Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
Newly recognized content

  Canada lynx by Sainsf
  Gigantorhynchus by Mattximus
  Leech by LittleJerry, Chiswick Chap and Cwmhiraeth
  Orangutan by LittleJerry
  Secretarybird by LittleJerry, Aa77zz and Casliber
  Vermilion flycatcher by CaptainEek
  Bat virome by Enwebb, reviewed by Chidgk1
  Doedicurus by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by Hog Farm
  Dwarf dog-faced bat by Enwebb, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77
  Echinodon by IJReid, reviewed by JurassicClassic767
  Edvard August Vainio by Esculenta, reviewed by ChiswickCahp
  Hammer-headed bat by Enwebb, reviewed by Jens Lallensack
  Homo rudolfensis by Dunkleosteus77, reviewed by JurassicClassic767
  Nina Demme by SusunW, reviewed by Enwebb
  Northern crested newt by Tylototriton, reviewed by Enwebb
  Pterodactylus by JurassicClassic767, reviewed by ChiswickCahp
  Zebra by LittleJerry, reviewed by Dunkleosteus77

Newly nominated content

  Horseshoe bat by Enwebb
  Siamosaurus by PaleoGeekSquared
  Zebra by LittleJerry
  Australopithecus afarensis by Dunkleosteus77
  Australopithecus africanus by Dunkleosteus77
  Australopithecus bahrelghazali by Dunkleosteus77
  Australopithecus deyiremeda by Dunkleosteus77
  Australopithecus sediba by Dunkleosteus77
  Bonelli's eagle by Sandhillcrane
  Great flying fox by Enwebb
  Homo habilis by Dunkleosteus77
  Markham's storm petrel by Therapyisgood
  Ornithocheiridae by JurassicClassic767
  Paranthropus aethiopicus by Dunkleosteus77
  Paranthropus boisei by Dunkleosteus77
  Paranthropus robustus by Dunkleosteus77
  Tatenectes by Slate Weasel

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Delivered on behalf of Enwebb (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Reply

15:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Mustelodon hoax warning edit

Hi, I'm one of the Catalan Wikipedia users who regularly write about mammals. Thanks for the heads-up on the Mustelodon hoax. It does look like this could be the longest-lived hoax we've ever had, at least on the English-language Wikipedia. Have a great day!--Leptictidium (mt) 06:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Leptictidium, and thank you for correcting my machine translation so that it was more understandable :) Enwebb (talk) 16:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

16:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up edit

Hello! Thank you for simply pointing out WP:ENGVAR and not biting my head off. My impression about how this was being handled was incorrect. Cheers! Nightsmaiden (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nightsmaiden, I imagine most people find learning easiest when they are not being belittled :) Happy to help, please drop me a line if you have questions while editing. Enwebb (talk) 20:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Egyptian Rousette bat: A natural reservoir for MARV edit

On the Egyptian Rousette bat being a reservoir for Marbug, there is a CDC dispatch in regards to this. The discovery gives credence to specific populations of the Egyptian Rousette as being a natural reservoir for MARV. Here is a link to the dispatch: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/24/6/17-2165_article

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck edit

Hi Enwebb/Archive 4,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Great flying fox edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Great flying fox you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter edit

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  •   Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
  •  HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
  •   Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020 Tree of Life Newsletter edit

  Discuss this issue

You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.


Delivered on behalf of Enwebb (talk) 17:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Mail edit

 
Hello, Enwebb. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Big Brown Bat picture edit

I had a quick question for you: IMHO, the image that is featured first on the big brown bat page doesn't do a super great job 'showing off' the species. What are your thoughts about using one of these [115][116][117][118] (I especially like the last one)?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Gen. Quon, yeah absolutely, the last one is great and I also like the second one. The article could stand to have more pictures in general, especially considering what a common and well-photographed species it is. When's our next GA collab? A big "pie in the sky" I've thought about is a WP:GT of Bats of the United States. So any US species would work if you have interest. Enwebb (talk) 01:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'll go ahead and add those two in; feel free to adjust if you'd like. And another GA collaboration would be fun. I’m partial to goofy little insect-eaters like the eastern red or the hoary bat. While it’s not US-based, I also like the Northern ghost bat.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Gen. Quon, eastern red would be good! It is mostly already in the structure used in other bat GAs like little brown bat, big brown bat, and tricolored bat:
  1. Taxonomy
  2. Description
  3. Biology / Biology and ecology
  4. Range and habitat
  5. Conservation
Definitely would want more about the effect of wind turbines--I think that's a pretty serious source of mortality for these guys. Enwebb (talk) 02:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Good point. I've heard about that and cars being pretty lethal, too. I'll try to gather up some research!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Also, I put out a call for eastern red bat pics on a bat-centered Facebook group. Some folks have responded. I can send you the link you'd like.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes definitely. I've tried doing stuff like this before on Facebook with the North American Society of Bat Research. People always express interest and then just...don't follow through and upload the pics. Maybe it would work out with more follow-up, though. Enwebb (talk) 16:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cool, I sent the link via Wiki-Email. Let me know if it doesn't get to you.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Side question: While doing some preliminary work for the eastern red bat, I decided to really quickly make an article for Lasiurus frantzii. However, some sources, such as this show it as a subspecies, whereas others, like this contend it is its own species. Is there a good way to handle this?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Gen. Quon, yeah, that's a hard one. Lasiurus is tricky. I went ahead and followed the ASM mammal diversity database in recognizing three genera in Lasiurini (Lasiurus + Dasypterus and Aeorestes), so that could be precedent for following ASM again and recognizing L. frantzii as distinct. Whenever MSW4 eventually comes out we can clean up inconsistencies. I think it's justifiable either way. Enwebb (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Cool. For a start, do you think the article is OK as it is right now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it's a solidly decent stub. I added a couple of categories, did the stub sorting, and added needs-photo and needs-map parameters to the talk page template. Enwebb (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Another quick question: Is this a photo of Lasiurus frantzii? It's labelled Lasiurus borealis frantzii. Is this just an outdated synonym (a la L. b. teliotis)?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

21:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Great flying fox edit

The article Great flying fox you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Great flying fox for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

16:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK edit

Seeing as United States Elections Project and Michael P. McDonald were created within the last seven days, any thoughts about proposing a DYK (esp with the election coming up). HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

HickoryOughtShirt?4, I think the election project page would need to be roughly doubled, but that sounds good. I just wanted to get something started, I'm sure there's more to be added. I'm having a hard time locating when the project was founded, though. Enwebb (talk) 20:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
I think it was 2014 per this. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
HickoryOughtShirt?4, now-defunct elections.gmu.edu website. that makes it sound like it was somewhere else before 2014, George Mason University, not that it was founded in 2014. Which makes sense because McDonald worked there. Wayback Machine might be able to help, but I gotta run for now. Enwebb (talk) 21:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

16:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter edit

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is   Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by   Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points.   The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with   Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were   Hog Farm (submissions),   HaEr48 (submissions),   Harrias (submissions) and   Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck edit

HI Enwebb/Archive 4,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

17:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Horseshoe bat scheduled for TFA edit

This is to let you know that the Horseshoe bat article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 7, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 7, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you today for the article "about a family of bats that have been quite relevant in the news lately as the possible origin of SARS-CoV. They have a lot of diversity and some strange features, even for bats (pubic nipples!)"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:20, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol December Newsletter edit

 

Hello Enwebb,

 

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
 
 
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Enwebb, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 03:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Enwebb, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup! edit

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply