User talk:Enterprisey/sandbox2
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Enterprisey in topic RfC close request for WT:MoS discussion
 | This page is used by Enterprisey to test scripts that use the talk page, like reply-link. |
no not this again 2 edit
RfC close request for WT:MoS discussion edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Would someone please close this RfC, about the use of "was" vs. "is" to describe defunct periodical publications? A short discussion at the end made it apparent that there is not enough agreement on the outcome to avoid a formal close. Thanks. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
ruining it Enterprisey (talk!) 05:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- ruining it, but indented Enterprisey (talk!) 05:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)