Group 1 Doing the Review

edit

Review #1 REACTuiuc123 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC) The page looks pretty good, like the Chem box on the right looks good, and it looks like you have some good references for the page. But, I think you should incorpate more into the page, longer paragraphs and things like that, and also if could make the picture bigger, that would make the page look better as well. The references should also have the in-text citations for them, which are not there. Thanks! Review #2 Starting from the top, I think you should make a title with the compound name. You have a good start on the information but obviously it needs to be fleshed out. You mentioned that the compound is practically insoluble. You may want to expand on that a bit. What exactly does that mean? Some numbers would be nice in my opinion. How insoluble is it?Reply


Review #3 The article was very well written and after taking a quick look through the MSDS and PubChem, it looks like you found some very reliable sources and did a good job referencing them with footnotes in ChemBox. The occurrence section is also very interesting!

The first thing you should do is the fine coding of the page itself. Get rid of |200px|alt=|]] under the image and the Cite error in the flash point. The extra information for boiling point [at 760 mmHg] is not necessary. The chem box already specifies that at the end. I was looking through other more developed chemical compound articles and found that footnotes aren't necessary in ChemBoxes. So for information like appearance, you can transfer that footnote into properties instead.

Atleast for the sake of james scholar point credit, if you can find the synthesis reaction(s) for Copper Oxalate, that would help fill up some points since it counts as reactions. I looked it up and some hits came up quickly from Tuwien university. You can also look for the synthesis through industry websites. Otherwise, great work and best of luck! Reactorgo22 Reactorgo22 (talk) 06:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Kevin Dinh, netID: kdinh2, Group 1 REACT, Review #3Reply

This article is inferior and is not ready to be uploaded

edit

This article, like most from this class, reads poorly and requires major help from a professional chemist. Ask your teacher to contact the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. Please do not upload this article until it meets our minimal standards--Smokefoot (talk) 02:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply