Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Emily.Will! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:30, Wednesday, August 21, 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Emily.Will/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Emily.Will/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Possible sockpuppet edit

This account was created the day after a single-purpose advertising account (for GS Diamonds) Kristeva.kris was blocked as an advertising-only account. The sandbox page tagged for deletion per {{db-g11}} (see above) was identical to the page written by Kristeva.kris. – Athaenara 13:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Emily.Will. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 14:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 14:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emily.Will (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have no purpose to advertise smth. I only was trying to make an article for some company. Article have no promotional links or texts. ALso I've been updated random articles on wikipedia. That's interesting. Please, unblock so I can continue working on your encyclopedia

Decline reason:

You'll need to provide a plausible explanation for the uncanny similarity between the contents of your sandbox and the deleted drafts created by Kristeva.kris, as well as your relationship with GS Diamonds (who have been advertising for editors to create a Wikipedia article about them for a while now). Yunshui  07:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emily.Will (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Is it bad to create a page for that company (if they do it for a while)? Yes, I got that information from the Internet. BUT I've deleted all promotional and unproofed information. And left only information which I found proofs on the official websites and government website. How it could be promotional to tell official proofs and story about the company?

Decline reason:

Wait... so your explanation is that you blatantly violated WP:COPYRIGHT?!? That you stole other people's content? Well, we very definitely need to leave you blocked, then. Note this doesn't explain how you were able to reuse content from other blocked spammers which weren't published elsewhere. Regardless, good block. Yamla (talk) 10:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Emily.Will (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I understand that. Can you explain which info in that article was promotional? Also, will I be blocked forever or what? How I can start to publish again? Emily.Will (talk) 12:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You haven't answered our questions. You will not be unblocked until you do, and you also need to give an undertaking that you will not edit about anything where you have a conflict of interest. If you do not address these points in their entirety in your next appeal, your ability to make further appeals will be withdrawn. To answer your question: if you have a conflict of interest, the fact that you wrote it makes it promotional. MER-C 18:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.