Hello, Emery F. Red! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mean as custard (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Mean as custard (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Go to the stove!

edit

My thoughts in full in mine home page www.cosmology.hu --Emery F. Red (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Einstein's hypothesis of light quanta (photons), based on Philipp Lenard's 1902 discovery of the photoelectric effect, was initially rejected by Planck. He was unwilling to discard completely Maxwell's theory of electrodynamics. Basically, he was convinced about existence the light-ether.

Well, an editorial article from the nature physics June 2., 2011: Keep it simple?

Yes, we must go to the theoretic base for a starting point. The Cosmos is no more as a continuous unsolved problem of volume in own relative system: Is that or no compared to? Effect of it is the extending existence continuously by local extension quantum volumes as the neutrinos. This process is the extending light-ether. Simple causality: no happened a Big Bang never! --Emery F. Red (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply