Elnurso
regarding your edit to the Azerbaijan article, please, I am an Iranian Azeri, and the facts speak for themselves ok?Azerbaijani 21:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Being an Azeri doesn't mean anything. One does not have to have a high level of IQ to see how selective you are in your choices of information from the pages of history and how you paraphrase them to fit the ultimate goal of yours: that the Republic of Azerbaijan is a fake entity. I really do not care even if we got the name 50 years ago, Resulzade was aplogizing for it, etc. What matters for us, people living in that land, is the well being of the people there, that is it. I am extremely amused by the fact that, Iranians, forgetting about putting their house into order, failing to create a decent society in such a culturally and economically area, ending up with one of the most ridiculously heart-breaking societal and political institutions in the entire world, still spend time and money to spoil other people's day by attacking their identity. Every identity emerged at one point in time. Every name emerged at one point in time. America? France? Turkey? Coming to the fore 1000 years ago or 100 years ago; why should that matter?
And after all,
1. today's Republic of Azerbaijan was called Azerbaijan before. I will enter the information with the reference soon.
2. Resulzade was politician and to get relationships into order could have said what you cite, but this does not refute his lifetime endeavor revolving around the Republic of Azerbaijan, norminally and substantively.
3. The only reason Bolsheviks keep the name Azerbaijan was not their amibition towards Iran. The name was already there. The bureaucracy working with the name was already there. People, students, army living under the name were already there. Why bother to change an already established name if it was not fundamentally against communist principles and strategy?
4. Stop referring to obscure web sites where pan-iranians hang out, like that of Iranian Chamber...
5. Write down your true name please, because I probably do know who you are. That will make the discussion more intersting.
Elnur
3rr violation edit
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.Azerbaijani 19:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block edit
Regarding reversions[1] made on January 8 2007 to Azerbaijan edit
3rr to William edit
Hi William,
This is Elnur writing with the nick Elnurso and with the IP address that has been blocked too. First, I am sorry for sometimes forgetting to log in, that is, this computer is always used by me, Elnurso, but I will be careful to log in every time I am editing from now on.
As to the 3rr. The person under the nick "Azerbaijani" is very active in every page that is related to the Republic of Azerbaijan. If you follow his activities, it is always designed to prove that the Republic of Azerbaijan is a fake entity in name and in substance, people there has that name and indetity becase they have a political agenda of destroying Iran helped by Jews and Pan-Turkists. If "Azerbaijani" is objective, his conclusions cannot be the same all the time; but they are. And they are simply all the time: the Republic of Azerbaijan, or anything related to Azerbaijan is just a marginal offshoot of Iran. Almost everybody in the discussion page of "Azerbaijan" disagrees with him. But his determination to spread misinformation prevailed over other users. He is not discussing his choices of extremely biased sources (one of the sources he uses is from representative of Armenian Republic, which is currently in war with Azerbaijan for instance) he just mechanically continues to insert biased paragraphs out of context with very questionable references.
And he is clever. He managed to deceive me into correcting the disinformation three times or so in 24 hours, while himself organizing it so that he shared the exact opposite reversions with other users (or himself under a different name). As a result, he made me FORMALLY appear to reversing three times, while keeping himself clean. This is a very clever move in Wikipedia, where administrators are very busy and would not spend a lot of time per problem.
By the same token he managed to put a protection in a very biased paragraph on Ahmad Kasravi, which has no social scientific value and reference. Please consider this, sorry I gave you earful. But unfortunately, a person with a bad faith can do a lot of harm to Wkipedia. Please unblock me. I am extremely sorry that I have to spend so much time to correct a stubborn urge for misinformation by an Iranian nationalist. Thank you for your time.
Elnur
- Whatever your rights and wrong, please stick to WP:3RR. See WP:DR for other ways to solve conflicts other than edit warring William M. Connolley 18:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey Elnurso. While I agree that the disputed material should be taken out for now, you might want to have a look at this: Wikipedia:Protection policy#Editing protected pages. In essence, by editing substance in a protected article, I would be forcing a point of view on the majority of editors who can't edit protected pages, which generally should not be done. There is already at {{totally-disputed-section}} tag there—I hope this will suffice for now. In the meantime, I highly recommend that you try following the dispute resoltuion process, and see if that works. If that fails, try making a request for mediation. Regards, Khoikhoi 06:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi edit
Hi. Can you please contact me? Thanks. Grandmaster 10:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)