November 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shaka— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flooded with them hundreds 20:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Elnencatala, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Elnencatala! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2019

edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 20:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Politic-Ed

edit

Politic-Ed is a British-owned, American English political opinion news site. Politic-Ed focuses on international politics news, ranging from policy changes in EU countries to Brexit to presidential elections. Politic-Ed distributes its content through its website and social media platforms.

Politic-Ed
File:Politic-ed logo.jpg
Type of site
Politics news
Available inAmerican English
OwnerRaptor Consolidated Media Group
URLwww.politic-ed.com
CommercialYes
LaunchedJune 2019
Current statusOnline

Politic-Ed is a staunch supporter of CANZUK, a union between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

The aim of the site is to provide free political commentary to the masses, to quote their website it is "The place where CEO's, professors and regular Joe's can come to exchange political ideas"

History

edit

Origins

edit

Politic-Ed was founded in June 2019 as a political news, analysis and opinion site by Raptor Consolidated Media Group. They employed former political lobbyist and analyst Matthew Booten[1] to be their main reporter, who has served as their Editor in Chief since the beginning.

Ideologies and Leanings

edit

Unlike many sites, Politic-Ed has no qualms in stating its political leaning- conservatism.

The site is Pro-Trump, however is not afraid to criticize him when criticism is due.

The site is also a staunch supporter of CANZUK, repeatedly attempting to get people to see the benefits of such a union.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 23:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

International Aviation HQ

edit

International Aviation HQ is a British-owned, American English aviation news site, with a focus on reporting the latest aviation news, analysis and opinion on the latest news from aviation-industry experts! International Aviation HQ distributes its content through its website and social media platforms.

International Aviation HQ
Type of site
Aviation news
Available inAmerican English
OwnerRaptor Consolidated Media Group
URLinternationalaviationhq.com
CommercialYes
LaunchedJune 2019
Current statusOnline

The aim of the site is to provide free commentary on the latest happenings of the aviation industry to other like-minded aviation geeks (sometimes called "Av Geeks"), to quote their website it is "Where industry experts, enthusiasts and photographers come together, it’s where they come to exchange ideas, and talk everything aviation."

History

edit

Origins

edit

International Aviation HQ was founded in June 2019 as an aviation-oriented news, analysis and opinion site by Raptor Consolidated Media Group[2]. They employed former F-16, 747 and 787 pilot Christopher Harrow to be their main reporter and as their Editor in Chief, a role he has done since the beginning of International Aviation HQ.

References

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy (talk) 15:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

avoid pushing your publication

edit

It's not the way wikipedia works.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 05:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Using sock puppets makes it worse.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Elnencatala. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

I just wanted to say hi! Mi lo que solo empiezar de la este interesso no me anque. --ViscountVismut (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi too! Jo no me intera, lo es que inlen sola mis enclas! --EtaPravda (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour Mate! I may not speak Catalan, but I would like to ask you something: Catalan independence- yay or nay? --HK2267 (talk) 18:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

Oh no...

edit

Oh no... --Hazza9976 (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Morigal (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

Your draft article, User:Elnencatala/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Elnencatala. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! SD0001 (talk) 16:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply