ElisabethLesser

Welcome

Hello, ElisabethLesser, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Biglulu (talk) 05:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! ElisabethLesser, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Matt Fellowes.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! David_FLXD (Talk) 12:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Matt Fellowes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

David_FLXD (Talk) 04:48, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Fellowes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Fellowes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Fellowes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. David_FLXD (Talk) 04:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Help request

Conflict of Interest, but notable person ElisabethLesser (talk) 16:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

A conflict of interest need not prevent you contributing, as long as you are open about it. See WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest for guidance.

You are welcome to comment at the deletion discussions of your articles - read WP:DISCUSSAFD for advice before you do, and make sure to declare your COI in any comment you make.

Wikipedia:Notability is not a matter of opinion, or of saying so, but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also WP:42.

The deletion discussions will run (normally) for seven days, anyone may contribute, and at the end an uninvolved administrator will decide what to do, based not on a count of heads but on the arguments presented in terms of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You may continue to edit the article, e.g. to add references, during the discussion.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ElisabethLesser. You have new messages at David FLXD's talk page.
Message added 10:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

David_FLXD (Talk) 10:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Matt Fellowes & HelloWallet

Hi Elisabeth, you may have seen that both of these deletion discussions have now concluded. As I suspected might happen, neither article was deleted, and there was a fairly solid "Keep" conclusion in the case of Matt Fellowes. This will help to protect this article against any future challenges. The "No consensus" conclusion to the HelloWallet article was more due to the lack of people contributing than to an actual inability to decide. My own view is that if Matt Fellowes meets notability guidelines, then HelloWallet certainly does. I am sorry if you felt that I was out to 'get' you, or the articles at any point - this was never the case. I really just wanted community consensus. If at any point in future you have problems with the articles, please feel free to contact me for support - I am at least one editor who knows that the articles have been tested against Wikipedia's standards, and, as far as I am concerned, both have passed. Regards, David_FLXD (Talk) 18:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Fellowes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Fellowes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Fellowes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:59, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Terms of use

Just in case it applies, there was a 2014 update in our terms of use that might possibly possibly apply to you: see our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. My apologies if it does not, but I want to make sure you are aware of it just in case. DGG ( talk ) 23:41, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Fellowes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Fellowes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Fellowes (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)