Elgentleman

Elgentleman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Elgentleman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lambda Phi Epsilon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lambda Phi Epsilon was changed by Elgentleman (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869866 on 2014-09-10T06:31:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:31, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Lambda Phi Epsilon, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 20:30, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Grayfell (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lambda Phi Epsilon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges.

Additionally, you have been warned (above) about using the minor edit checkbox. You are not making minor edits.

☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 20:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Talk page edit

Hello! This is non-template message for once. I've moved your recent comments on Talk:Lambda Phi Epsilon to their own section at the bottom of the page (new sections always go on the bottom of talk pages). I did this because that section was quite old, and a recent comment was very likely to get overlooked. Also, new comments on older talk sections tend to "bump" them for automated talk page archiving, which makes the talk page archives messy. Since the discussion was so old, I think we can agree it's best to let it get archived and get a fresh start on any such debates. If you disagree, please revert. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)