ElectMayor

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia

Your edits are fundamentally incompatible with Wikipedia's goals. If you continue to edit in this manner, your editing privileges will be revoked. Consider this your only warning. MER-C 11:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Not sure what this is all about. Not very friendly, is it? GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, ElectMayor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Directly elected mayors in the United Kingdom

To be as open with you as possible - I've put the following comments about your edits on the talk page for Directly elected mayors in the United Kingdom. I really think you should look at the way Wikipedia is written before reverting edits people have made to your contributions, espeically when those edits still retain legitimate factual details you've contributed. You should also have a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:External links - but most importantly, remember Wikipedia is collaborative and people will make edits to things you write. there are processes to use if you disagree with them.

(From Talk:Directly elected mayors in the United Kingdom) I don't think I'm being unfair in observing that the current problems this page is experiencing are overwhelmingly as a result of ElectMayor (talk). Also looking at his/her contributions (s)he seems like an interested party who can't observe NPOV rules. There are obvious problems with the writing style, grammar and use of weblinks too but ElectMayor now seems to be quite persistent in reverting changes made to his/her edits (even when the original changes still contain parts of his/her contributions). Anyone else? Pjbeef (talk)

Edit summaries

Hi ElectMayor! Thanks for your recent contributions. When editing an article on Wikipedia you probably noticed there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written in the field will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:01, 26 June 2011 (UTC))

Editor assistance requests.

Hi ElectMayor. I'm just letting you know that there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#Repeated addition of non-NPOV material concerning articles you may have edited. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Neutral Point Of View is not optional here, even if I agree with you myself (and I do)

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Directly elected mayors in the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Do not resuscitate, you may be blocked from editing. Jesanj (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2011 (UTC)