Eirelover@earthlink.net
|
It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Rms125a@hotmail.com. Please refer to [1] for evidence. See block log. |
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
- User:Redwolf24/Bootcamp My own personal summarized Bootcamp.
Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.
Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.
Redwolf24 (Talk) 03:00, 8 September 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 25 May 2024 T 05:56 UTC.
P.S. I like messages :-P
Links. edit
Robert!
LINKS Why do you continue to break links and change links? What did you take out all of the year "in sports" links and just put in regular links?
Also, I have told you before. If you have the same thing in an article, like "New York City", you don't need to link it every time.
You have also been told REPEATEDLY about breaking DEAD-RED links, but yet you just go ahead and do it again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again. WHY?
Why do you do this shit? You have been told OVER and OVER. But you just don't want to listen. WHY? We have the "Manual of Style", and "How to Edit a Page", and we want ALL the articles to have the same look and feel.
You are so stuborn? WHY? Why do you do the shit you do?
And don't give me that "I'M SORRY" crap.
Play well with others, or you will continue to be blocked, again, and again, until they get so tired of you they block the entire IP address range.
WikiDon 01:27, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
its cause he likes to fuck with people and just doesn't give a fuck.
WIKIDON: Don't you care who wrote the above and didn't even have the courage to sign their name or whatever they go by??
Secondly, I received ONE (1) friendly word of advice from somebody some time ago about not deleting EVERY red link I come across; but I understood that to mean to use discretion and only delete those which are useless, outdated, old, irrelevant and/or have almost no possibility of being updated/linked (or whatever term you use). I didn't realize that that meant never to ever delete any red link under any circumstances. Now that I know that I can assure you that I will comply with what apparently you meant (which I have outlined here). If I am wrong, juts let me know!!
Thanks and sorry. You are a nice guy and I don't/didn't mean to frustrate you and make you so angry!! Eirelover@earthlink.net 02:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC) Eirelover@earthlink.net 02:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Robert - will you ever quit POVving up that article with your own biased diatribe. This time you even managed to revert the pic that User:Beyonce added, in your haste to get your sectarian nonsense published. The very least you can do is discuss it on the talk page but you refuse to dialog with other editors. Why not? - Ali-oops✍ 20:34, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
I Make Sense edit
Im going to keep this short and sweet.Daingeann-Co. Offaly An Daingean-Co.Kerry.Im right, your wrong.--Play Brian Moore 22:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Rms125a@hotmail.com Sock puppet evidence edit
In response to Demiurge reverting 70.19.72.158's "where apartheid schooling by creed has been the rule" post in the George Galloway article with the edit summary "rv sockpuppet POV"[2], the newly created Sockpuppet@earthlink.net account immediately readded the deleted material[3]. When the material was removed, 63.164.145.85 readded it.[4] Alison removed 63.164.145.85's post with the edit summary "rv usual, daily User:Rms125a@hotmail.com sock-puppetry / POV."[5] 70.19.40.53 reinserted the material,[6][7] which Alison deleted as coming from User:Rms125a@hotmail.com's sockpuppet.[8]. 67.101.192.69 then reinserted the material.[9][10], which was deleted. Doc Glasgow then reinserted the material.[11]. This user, Eirelover@earthlink.net, then reinserted the material.[12]. 70.19.72.158, User:Sockpuppet@earthlink.net, 63.164.145.85, 70.19.40.53, 67.101.192.69, and Doc Glasgow are suspected sock puppets of Rms125a@hotmail.com. -- Jreferee t/c 15:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)