Editingwiki777

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Éliphas Lévi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Éliphas Lévi was changed by Editingwiki777 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890667 on 2021-03-08T05:11:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chaos magic. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Most of your edits appear to relate to adding criticism sections on articles that cite Nietzsche on topics he didn't talk about and are either completely unsourced or only have sources for quotes. Please understand that articles are not meant to contain original research — this includes your own critique. – 🐱? (talk) ^{(ping me!)} 01:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Your recent editing history at Chaos magic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – 🐱? (talk) ^{(ping me!)} 03:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Book of Abramelin. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Chaos Magic, you may be blocked from editing. Skyerise (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Chaos Magic. Skyerise (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Skyerise (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 15:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 15:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)