August 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Renewal6. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ephedra (plant) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 23:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 06:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of sourced content

edit

Regarding your edit [1], I am afraid you are erasing sourced content. In particular Zhang 2021 (whose quote you erased) states clearly "The Tarim mummies are currently the best representative of the pre-pastoralist ANE-related population that once inhabited Central Asia and southern Siberia (Extended Data Fig. 2A), even though Tarim_EMBA1 postdates these populations in time.", among many other sourced items. I suggest you self-revert. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply